What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
absolute absolute monarchy Althusius ancient aristocracy Aristotle authority basis Bodin body Bossuet Calvin Catholic century chap character Christian church civil common commonwealth conception consent constitution contract Council of Trent distinction divine right doctrine dogma duty ecclesiastical embodied England English ethics Europe existence fact Filmer form of government function governmental Grotius Henry Morley Hobbes Hobbes's Huguenots human Ibid idea individual influence institutions ius gentium jurists justice king law of nations law of nature legislation Leviathan liberty Locke logical Louis XIV Luther Machiavelli magistrates Melanchthon ment merely method Milton monarch monarchomachs Montesquieu moral natural law natural rights obedience organization Parliament party peace political philosophy political science political theory popular sovereignty practical prince principle Protestant Pufendorf Puritan reason Reformers relation religious republican Revolution Roman royal rule secular social society sovereign Spinoza spirit Suarez supreme power tion toleration Treatises whole
Page 271 - ... that nature should thus dissociate and render men apt to invade and destroy one another; and he may therefore, not trusting to this inference made from the passions, desire perhaps to have the same confirmed by experience.
Page 278 - A Commonwealth is said to be instituted when a multitude of men do agree, and covenant, every one with every one, that to whatsoever man, or assembly of men, shall be given by the major part the right to present the person of them all, that is to say, to be their representative...
Page 217 - that is no subject for the tongue of a lawyer, nor is it lawful to be disputed. It is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what God can do : good Christians content themselves with His will revealed in His word ; so it is presumption and high contempt in a subject to dispute what a king can do, or say that a king cannot do this or that ; but rest in that which is the king's will revealed in his law.
Page 266 - But whatsoever is the object of any man's appetite or desire, that is it which he for his part calleth good: and the object of his hate and aversion, evil; and of his contempt, vile and inconsiderable. For these words of good, evil, and contemptible, are ever used with relation to the person that useth them: there being nothing simply and absolutely so; nor any common rule of good and evil, to be taken from the nature of the objects themselves...
Page 336 - The Judgment and Decree of the University of Oxford past in their Convocation July 21, 1683, against certain Pernicious Books and Damnable Doctrines, destructive to the Sacred Persons of Princes, their State and Government, and of all Humane Society.
Page 161 - I saw prevailing throughout the Christian world a license in making war of which even barbarous nations would have been ashamed, recourse being had to arms for slight...
Page 355 - This therefore contains the power of war and peace, leagues and alliances, and all the transactions with all persons and communities without the commonwealth, and may be called federative if any one pleases.
Page 211 - ... strifes and troubles would be endless, except they gave their common consent all to be ordered by some whom they should agree upon: without which consent there were no reason that one man should take upon him to be lord or judge over another...
From Google Scholar
Mark P Petracca - 1991 - Policy Analysis
All Scholar search results »
黄颂 - 2002 - 山西师大学报: 社会科学版
POLITICAL THEORIES.; A HISTORY OF POLITICAL THEORIES. From Luther ...
JSTOR: A History of Political Theories: From Luther to Montesquieu.
Digital Library of India