How Should One Live?: Comparing Ethics in Ancient China and Greco-Roman Antiquity (Google eBook)
Richard A.H. King, Dennis Schilling
Walter de Gruyter, Jul 27, 2011 - Philosophy - 343 pages
Chinese and Greco-Roman ethics present highly articulate views on how one should live; both of these traditions remain influential in modern philosophy. The question arises how these traditions can be compared with one another. Comparative ethics is a relatively young discipline; this volume is a major contribution to the field. Fundamental questions about the nature of comparing ethics are treated in two introductory chapters, and core issues in each of the traditions are addressed: harmony, virtue, friendship, knowledge, the relation of ethics to morality, relativism, emotions, being and unity, simplicity and complexity, and prediction.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
according action activity ancient China aretê argument Aristotelian Aristotle Aristotle’s Aristotle’s ethics Beijing Chapter character Chinese Philosophy Chu mu zhujian claim complex conception concerned Confucian Confucius context courage culture Daodejing Daoist desire discussion distinctions divination early Chinese emotions Epicurean eudaimonia example friendship Greek Guodian Chu Hán Fēi Zǐ harmony Heaven human important interpretation kind knowledge Laches Laozi Liezi Lunyu Lüshi chunqiu meaning Mencius Mengzi metaethical ming Mohist moral Mozi jiaozhu nature Nicias Nicomachean Ethics notion ofthe one’s parrhêsia passage perseverance joined person perspective philia Philodemus philosophical Plato political power to obligate practical praiseworthy prediction principle Protagoras question reason relationship relativist righteousness role sage seems sense shang social Socrates Stoic texts theory things traditional translation understanding University Press virtue ethics virtuous wisdom words wrong Wuxing Xunzi Yearley Zhuangzi Zuozhuan