The Politics of Transition: Shaping a Post-Soviet Future

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, Aug 27, 1993 - History - 277 pages
0 Reviews
The Soviet system has undergone a dramatic transformation: from communist monopoly to multiparty politics, from Marxism to competing values, from centralisation to fragmentation, and from state ownership to a mixed economy. This book, by three of the West's leading scholars of Soviet and post-Soviet affairs, traces the politics of transition in the late 1980s and early 1990s from its origins to its uncertain post-communist future. The authors analyse the full impact of transition on official and popular values, central and local political institutions, post-Soviet republics, the CPSU and the parties which replaced it, and political participation. A final chapter considers the problematic nature of this form of 'democracy from above'. Detailed but clearly and accessibly written, The politics of transition provides an ideal guide to the changes that have been taking place in the politics of the newly independent nations that together constitute a sixth of the world's land surface.
  

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Beyond Marxism
1
Reforming the electoral system
20
Structures of government
39
The Presidency and central government
60
From union to independence
79
Patterns of republic and local politics
98
The withering away of the party
117
The emergence of competitive politics
140
The politics of economic interests
164
Public opinion and the political process
178
Letters and political communication
193
The Soviet transition and democracy from above
212
Index
274
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (1993)

Graeme Gill is Professor of Government and Public Administration and an ARC Australian Professorial Fellow at The University of Sydney. Prior to his appointment at Sydney, he held teaching positions at Monash University and The University of Tasmania. He has been a long-time student of Soviet and
Russian politics, but has also published on democratisation and the development of the state. He has been a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in Australia since 1994

Bibliographic information