In this book Tibor R. Machan analyses the state of the debate on libertarianism post Nozick. Going far beyond the often cursory treatment of libertarianism in major books and other publications he examines closely the alternative non-Nozickian defences of libertarianism that have been advanced and, by applying these arguments to innumerable policy areas in the field, Machan achieves a new visibility and prominence for libertarianism.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Is It Responsible to be Free?
Here to Stay?
Justice Self and Natural Rights
Individualism and the Vitality of Community Life
Economics and Human Values
Finding the Rational
A Positive Libertarian View of Government
Allies After All?
Between Parent and Child
Should Ads for Hazardous Goods be Banned?
I6 The Ideology of Death that Will Not
l7 Libertarianism and Conservatism
l8 Socialism Redux on the Horizon
l9 Two Philosophers Skeptical of Negative Liberty
Does Libertarianism Imply the Welfare State?
The Dependence of Equality on Liberty
Robert Nozick and the Libertarian Alternative
Will Technology Make Us Free?
How Critical is Critical Legal Studies?
Should You Apologize?
Why Agreement Is Not Enough
action American argue argument Aristotle Ayn Rand basic behavior beneﬁts Chicago choice claim classical liberal coercion coercive communitarians compact theory conception concern conduct conﬂict course Critical Legal Studies criticism Crits defend deﬁnition discussion economic economists ethics example exist fact ﬁeld ﬁnd ﬁrst ﬂourishing free market free society freedom fulﬁll fundamental Hoover Institution human community human nature Human Rights idea identiﬁed individual rights institutions issue Jan Narveson John Locke John Rawls justice justiﬁed kind libertarian liberty lives Machan Marx matter means Milton Friedman minarchist natural rights negative liberty negative rights normative objective obligation ofﬁcial one’s person philosophical position principles private property problem property rights protection public policy question rational Rawls reason reﬂect requires respect rights theory Robert Nozick scientiﬁc sense signiﬁcant simply skepticism someone speciﬁc Sterba sufﬁcient things Tibor tradition understanding University Press values violate virtue welfare wrong York