Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
My library | Help | Advanced Book Search | Web History | Sign in

Books

Man and His Symbols

 (Google eBook)
Front Cover
94 Reviews
Random House Digital, Inc., Feb 1, 2012 - Social Science - 320 pages
Illustrated throughout with revealing images, this is the first and only work in which the world-famous Swiss psychologist explains to the layperson his enormously influential theory of symbolism as revealed in dreams.


From the Paperback edition.
  

What people are saying - Write a review

User ratings

5 stars
29
4 stars
26
3 stars
24
2 stars
9
1 star
6

Great introduction to Symbolic Analysis - Goodreads
... great pictures, though. - Goodreads
The ending is however quite interesting. - Goodreads
Good for the introduction to the analytical psychology. - Goodreads
Lots of examples from patients and research. - Goodreads
This despite the book being filled with pictures. - Goodreads

Review: Man and His Symbols

User Review  - Natacha P - Goodreads

This was my first book on Jung and it had me hooked. The introduction states that this book was written with the simple, typical reader in mind—which makes this particular volume easy to read. I'm ... Read full review

Review: Man and His Symbols

User Review  - Jason - Goodreads

I really enjoyed Jung's Man and His Symbols. Jung's interpretation of dreams and the unconscious is fascinating, enlightening, and thought-provoking. He introduces logic and reason and sturdy ... Read full review

All 87 reviews »

Related books

Contents

 
PART 2  ANCIENT MYTHS AND MODERN MAN Joseph L Henderson
 
PART 3  THE PROCESS OF INDIVIDUATION ML von Franz
 
PART 4  SYMBOLISM IN THE VISUAL ARTS Aniela Jaffé
PART 5  SYMBOLS IN AN INDIVIDUAL ANALYSIS Jolande Jacobi
 
  SCIENCE AND THE UNCONSCIOUS ML von Franz
NOTES 
 ILLUSTRATION CREDITS
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2012)

Jung studied medicine at Basel, and worked at the Burgholzli mental health clinic in Zurich (1900-1909). He met Freud in 1907, and became his leading collaborator. He became critical of Freud's approach in 1913, which caused a break between them.

Bibliographic information