Coming to public judgment: making democracy work in a complex world
In his most important book to date, Daniel Yankelovich, the dean of American public research, offers a prescription for strengthening the public's hand in its silent power struggle with the experts.
31 pages matching citizens in this book
Results 1-3 of 31
What people are saying - Write a review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - LibraryThing
I thought this was a really perceptive book for the first 100 pages or so, as the author analyzed the nature of public opinion. He distinguishes unreflective and fickle "mass opinion" from the more elaborate and stable "public judgment" he hopes to promote. He also emphasizes that public judgment needs to be recognized as knowledge different from, but not inferior to, expert knowledge. All of this was quite interesting. But in the second half this book loses much of its originality. The author uses social psychological concepts to explain how public opinion develops, ending up with a quite meagre and nondescript analysis. Towards the end there are some strange chapters on the philosophy of knowledge which really contributes nothing to any preceding argument. I think that the author should have kept his writing better focused by discarding secondary material and that the book should have been much shorter.
Review: Coming to Public Judgment: Making Democracy Work in a Complex WorldUser Review - Goodreads
A must read for those in government interested in learning more about how to trust citizens to make sound decisions...
Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development
Limited preview - 1995
A Missing Concept
What Is Quality in Public Opinion?
20 other sections not shown