Lawrence Versus Texas (2003)LexisNexis, 2004 - Equality before the law |
Contents
Wade | 14 |
INTEREST OF AMICUS IN THIS CASE | 15 |
Ashcroft | 18 |
Copyright | |
122 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
Amici Curiae Amicus anal sex animus argument Association based on sexual bisexual Bowers brief claim classification Code Ann consensual consenting adults Constitution D'EMILIO decision deviate sexual intercourse discrimination Due Process Eisenstadt enacted engage Equal Protection Clause Fourteenth Amendment fundamental right gay and lesbian gender Griswold Hardwick heightened scrutiny heterosexual Homosexual Conduct Law Human Rights individual intimacy issue Justice Kinsey Reports Kinsey's LAW REVIEW legislative legislature legitimate lesbian Lesbian and Gay liberty male marital married Model Penal Code moral offense Paris Adult Theatre partners persons Petitioners police power political prohibited public health rational basis recognized regulation relationships Romer same-sex couples same-sex sodomy sexual acts Sexual Behavior sexual conduct sexual intercourse sexual orientation social sodomy laws sodomy statutes Stat supra Supreme Court TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Texas law tion traditional transgender TYRON GARNER United violates women