The Sokal Hoax: The Sham that Shook the Academy (Google eBook)
Alan D. Sokal
U of Nebraska Press, 2000 - Science - 271 pages
In May 1996 physicist Alan Sokal published an essay in the fashionable academic journal Social Text. The essay quoted hip theorists like Jacques Lacan, Donna Haraway, and Gilles Deleuze. The prose was thick with the jargon of poststructuralism.øAnd the point the essay tried to make was counterintuitive: gravity, Sokal argued, was a fiction that society had agreed upon, and science needed to be liberated from its ideological blinders.
When Sokal revealed in the pages of Lingua Franca that he had written the article as a parody, the story hit the front page of the New York Times. It set off a national debate still raging today: Are scholars in the humanities trapped in a jargon-ridden Wonderland? Are scientists deluded in thinking their work is objective? Are literature professors suffering from science envy? Was Sokal's joke funny? Was the Enlightenment such a bad thing after all? And isn't it a little bit true that the meaning of gravity is contingent upon your cultural perspective?
Collected here for the first time are Sokal's original essay on "quantum gravity," his essay revealing the hoax, the newspaper articles that broke the story, and the angry op-eds, letters, and e-mail exchanges sparked by the hoax from intellectuals across the country, including Stanley Fish, George F. Will, Michael Bärubä, and Katha Pollitt. Also included are extended essays in which a wide range of scholars ponder the long-term lessons of the hoax.
What people are saying - Write a review
The Sokal hoax: the sham that shook the academyUser Review - Not Available - Book Verdict
When Alan Sokal, a New York University physicist, published his paper "Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" in the special "science" issue of Social ... Read full review
Review: The Sokal Hoax: The Sham That Shook the AcademyUser Review - Brian - Goodreads
Just gripping, and a wonderful comeuppance to the secular variety of antiscience wacko. Read full review