Reviews

User reviews

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

The volume is published in 1808, not 1803. It includes correspondence from 1806 and mentions this fact on the title page, which should have made the error obvious.

All reviews - 1
5 stars - 0
4 stars - 0
3 stars - 0
2 stars - 0
1 star - 0

All reviews - 1
Editorial reviews - 0

All reviews - 1