Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges

Front Cover
AEI Press, Jan 1, 2003 - Law - 161 pages
1 Review
In general, courts have been activist in opposing majority views on such matters as sexual practices, secularism versus religion, rights of speech and expression and feminism. This judicial activism appears to impinge on the legitimate domains of the executive and legislative branches of government and constitutes the judicialization of politics and morals. According to Bork, a number of courts tend to act in this activist fashion. As well, international tribunals appear to exceed their jurisdiction, posing a threat to national sovereignty just as the national courts threaten democratic government. This activism is more than a threat; Bork argues that both sovereignty and self-government have already been seriously damaged. Coercing Virtue attempts to account for the phenomenon of why so may courts in democratic nations behave in an imperialistic manner and why the results almost always appear to advance the liberal political and cultural agenda.

What people are saying - Write a review

Review: Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges

User Review  - Adrienne - Goodreads

I enjoyed the data on recent history in Canada, Europe, and Israel. The book isn't good for much else. There might be something worthwhile deep down, very deep down, but the book was just not well thought through or presented. It just comes off as a bit of a rant. Read full review

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (2003)

Robert H. Bork is the author of The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law and Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline, and The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War With Itself. He served as Solicitor General and Acting Attorney General of the United States and was a U.S. Court of Appeals judge. Bork is a senior fellow at AEI. He and his wife live in McLean, Virginia.

Bibliographic information