The Survival Game: How Game Theory Explains the Biology of Cooperation and Competition (Google eBook)
From a zoologist and psychologist, an astonishing look at the biological and strategic roots of human decisions
Humans, like bacteria, woodchucks, chimpanzees, and other animals, compete or cooperate in order to get food, shelter, territory, and other resources to survive. But how do they decide whether to muscle out or team up with the competition?
In The Survival Game, David P. Barash synthesizes the newest ideas from psychology, economics, and biology to explore and explain the roots of human strategy. Drawing on game theory-the study of how individuals make decisions-he explores the give-and-take of spouses in determining an evening's plans, the behavior of investors in a market bubble, and the maneuvers of generals on a battlefield alongside the mating and fighting strategies of "less rational" animals. Ultimately, Barash's lively and clear examples shed light on what makes our decisions human, and what we can glean from game theory and the natural world as we negotiate and compete every day.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
acorn woodpeckers advantage Anatol Rapoport animals average Axelrod Battle behave behavior benefit better biologists bourgeois choose competitive conflict coordination games cost decision defectors Dollar Auction doves equally especially evolution evolutionary example fact females Game of Chicken game theoreticians game theory games of Prisonerís genes go straight hawk Hawk-Dove Game hawks and doves highest payoff human Imagine Imamura inclined individual interactions interest irrational isopods Kenney kind least less logic look lose male mathematical mating mutual cooperation mutual defection Nash equilibrium nonetheless nuclear oneís opponent options otherís outcome paradox payoff matrix percent play player possible potential prefer Prisonerís Dilemma probably problem psychologists Punishment rationality reason reproductive result retaliator Reward risk selfish sex ratio sexual side Similarly simply situation sluts social dilemmas someone Soviet Stag Hunt strategy Sucker Suckerís payoff swerve tempted theorists things TIT-FOR-TAT Tosca turn typically Ultimatum Game wants worse worst