Cooperation Without Trust? (Google eBook)
Russell Sage Foundation, Apr 5, 2007 - Political Science - 267 pages
Some social theorists claim that trust is necessary for the smooth functioning of a democratic society. Yet many recent surveys suggest that trust is on the wane in the United States. Does this foreshadow trouble for the nation? In Cooperation Without Trust? Karen Cook, Russell Hardin, and Margaret Levi argue that a society can function well in the absence of trust. Though trust is a useful element in many kinds of relationships, they contend that mutually beneficial cooperative relationships can take place without it. Cooperation Without Trust? employs a wide range of examples illustrating how parties use mechanisms other than trust to secure cooperation. Concerns about one’s reputation, for example, could keep a person in a small community from breaching agreements. State enforcement of contracts ensures that business partners need not trust one another in order to trade. Similarly, monitoring worker behavior permits an employer to vest great responsibility in an employee without necessarily trusting that person. Cook, Hardin, and Levi discuss other mechanisms for facilitating cooperation absent trust, such as the self-regulation of professional societies, management compensation schemes, and social capital networks. In fact, the authors argue that a lack of trust—or even outright distrust—may in many circumstances be more beneficial in creating cooperation. Lack of trust motivates people to reduce risks and establish institutions that promote cooperation. A stout distrust of government prompted America’s founding fathers to establish a system in which leaders are highly accountable to their constituents, and in which checks and balances keep the behavior of government officials in line with the public will. Such institutional mechanisms are generally more dependable in securing cooperation than simple faith in the trustworthiness of others. Cooperation Without Trust? suggests that trust may be a complement to governing institutions, not a substitute for them. Whether or not the decline in trust documented by social surveys actually indicates an erosion of trust in everyday situations, this book argues that society is not in peril. Even if we were a less trusting society, that would not mean we are a less functional one.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Trust and Power
Cooperation Without Law or Trust
Institutional Alternatives to Trust
Organizational Design for Reliability
actions actors agents argue assess associations behavior chapter cial citizens claim clients communal norms competence conflict of interest contexts contracts cooperation corporate costs create credible commitments dependence devices discussed economic effective employees encapsulated interest enforcement Enron especially ethnic evidence example exchange fictive kinship firms focus Grameen Grameen Bank Hardin Hence high trusters important incentives individuals institutions interactions interpersonal issues lawyers less literature low trusters Margaret Levi ment monitoring moral commitments moral hazard motivations Ninov nomic ongoing organizational organizations partners party patients physician-patient relations physicians political potential prisoner's dilemma problems produce professional reciprocity reduce regulation rela relatively relevant reliability rely reputation reputation systems risk scientists social capital social networks social order society tions transaction transition trust and distrust trust and trustworthiness trust as encapsulated trust relations trust relationships typically workers Yamagishi