Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry

Front Cover
Princeton University Press, 1990 - Philosophy - 262 pages
1 Review
"Helen Longino has written a timely book that fills a critical gap in the existing literature between philosophy of science and the social studies of science. Her exposition of scientific inquiry as a context-laden process provides the conceptual tools we need to understand how social expectations shape the development of science while at the same time recognizing the dependence of scientific inquiry on its interactions with natural phenomena. This is an important book precisely because there is none other quite like it." --Evelyn Fox Keller, author of "Reflections on Gender and Science" Conventional wisdom has it that the sciences, properly pursued, constitute a pure, value-free method of obtaining knowledge about the natural world. In light of the social and normative dimensions of many scientific debates, Helen Longino finds that general accounts of scientific methodology cannot support this common belief. Focusing on the notion of evidence, the author argues that a methodology powerful enough to account for theories of any scope and depth is incapable of ruling out the influence of social and cultural values in the very structuring of knowledge. The objectivity of scientific inquiry can nevertheless be maintained, she proposes, by understanding scientific inquiry as a social rather than an individual process. Seeking to open a dialogue between methodologists and social critics of the sciences, Longino develops this concept of "contextual empiricism" in an analysis of research programs that have drawn criticism from feminists. Examining theories of human evolution and of prenatal hormonal determination of "gender-role" behavior, of sex differences in cognition, and of sexualorientation, the author shows how assumptions laden with social values affect the description, presentation, and interpretation of data. In particular, Longino argues that research on the hormonal basis of "sex-differentiated behavior" involves assumptions not only about gender relations but also about human action and agency. She concludes with a discussion of the relation between science, values, and ideology, based on the work of Habermas, Foucault, Keller, and Haraway.
  

What people are saying - Write a review

Review: Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry

User Review  - Zina - Goodreads

Way underappreciated in (general, not feminist) philosophy of science. Read full review

Review: Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry

User Review  - Austin - Goodreads

Some chapters are unnecessarily dense and complex (ie too much biological detail), but overall, I recommend this book to those interested in philosophy and/or science and/or gender. She makes a ... Read full review

Contents

Introduction Good Science Bad Science
3
Methodology Goals and Practices
16
Evidence and Hypothesis
38
Values and Objectivity
62
Values and Science
83
Research on Sex Differences
103
Explanatory Models in the Biology of Behavior
133
Science in Society
162
Science and Ideology
187
Conclusion Social Knowledge
215
WORKS CONSULTED
233
INDEX
251
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (1990)

Helen E. Longino is chair and the Clarence Irving Lewis Professor in the Department of Philosophy at Stanford University. She is the author of "Science as Social Knowledge" and "The Fate of Knowledge".

Bibliographic information