Rhetorical traditions and the teaching of writing
The argument of this book is that the earliest tradition of Western rhetoric, the classical perspective of Aristotle and Cicero, continues to have the greatest impact on writing instruction--albeit an unconscious impact. This occurs despite the fact that modern rhetoric no longer accepts either the views of mind, language, and world underlying ancient theory or the concepts about discourse, knowledge, and communication presented in that theory. As a result, teachers are depending on ideas as outmoded as they are unreflectively accepted. Knoblauch and Brannon maintain that the two traditions are fundamentally incompatible in their assumptions and concepts, so that writing teachers must make choices between them if their teaching is to be purposeful and consistent. They suggest that the modern tradition offers a richer basis for instruction, and they show what teaching from that perspective looks like and how it differs from traditional teaching.
3 pages matching I.A. Richards in this book
Results 1-3 of 3
What people are saying - Write a review
Review: Rhetorical Traditions and the Teaching of WritingUser Review - Goodreads
Dry, but essential reading for anyone teaching writing.
Review: Rhetorical Traditions and the Teaching of WritingUser Review - Bruce - Goodreads
this densely written book, found on the street several months ago, has had a great influence on my teaching of high-school English. Knoblauch and Brannon identify writing as a competency rather than a ... Read full review