A Comparison of Three Types of Work Activity Statements in Terms of the Consistency of Job Information Reported by IncumbentsPersonnel Laboratory, Wright Air Development Division, Air Research and Development Command, U.S. Air Force, 1960 - Job analysis - 73 pages |
Contents
Experimental Types of Statements | 2 |
Table | 8 |
Combinations of Scales and Order of Assembly | 17 |
4 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
activity statements Adjusted Error administration AFSC Air Force analyses of variance ANOV assistance obtained Cell Error check lists classified computed consistency measures descriptions Df MS F difficulty scales drain plug duties Elements Work Actions engine job experimental frequency of performance frequency scale given activity group of subjects individual inter-rater agreement inter-rater consistency inter-rater reliability interviews Jet Engine job analysis job incumbents judges mental difficulty non-supervisors number of statements occurrence statistic Periodic inspection Personnel physical difficulty position types Purdue Research Foundation Purdue University qualitative scales quantitative radar job rater consistency reliability of scale reported more consistently samples Sc X St scale categories scale responses squadron St Statements St X J St X R STATEMENTS IN TERMS Table continued tasks and elements test-retest reliability three types training desired training received transformed transmitter power output type of assistance type of training types of statements UNCLASSIFIED voltage regulator X J Sc