Bringing in the People: A Comparison of Constitutional Forms and Practices of the Referendum

Front Cover
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993 - Law - 312 pages
0 Reviews
The referendum is not a monolithic method of national decision making. There are a multitude of referendum forms which exist under varying constitutional conditions and operate in different ways. A global comparison shows that more than half the constitutions of the world provide for the referendum at a national level, but referendums are also carried out without explicit constitutional support. Two main forms of referendum can be observed, the mandatory constitutional referendum and the policy vote. This book argues that the referendum does not undermine representative decision making, but supplements it in various ways: the referendum is not diametrically opposed to representative government, and when properly designed and used, the institution of the referendum can enhance the legitimacy of a constitutional and political system. This book is the first comprehensive constitutional and comparative analysis of the referendum. It offers illuminating and intriguing reading for all those interested in national decision making.
  

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

INTRODUCTION
1
THE REFERENDUM IN THE CONTEXT OF NATIONAL
15
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTS
40
THE REFERENDUM AS A GLOBAL
126
THE REFERENDUM IN FOUR COUNTRIES
181
THE REFERENDUM IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERNATIONAL
235
REFLECTIONS ON THE THEME
271
BIBLIOGRAPHY
281
Danish and Irish referendums
303
SUBJECT INDEX
309
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 286 - The Federalist. A commentary on the constitution of the United States. A collection of essays, by Alexander Hamilton, Jay and Madison.

References to this book

All Book Search results »

Bibliographic information