Animals and Ethics, Third Edition
Broadview Press, May 27, 2009 - Philosophy - 240 pages
Can animals be regarded as part of the moral community? To what extent, if at all, do they have moral rights? Are we wrong to eat them, hunt them, or use them for scientific research? Can animal liberation be squared with the environmental movement? Taylor traces the background of these debates from Aristotle to Darwin and sets out the views of numerous contemporary philosophers – including Peter Singer, Tom Regan, Mary Anne Warren, J. Baird Callicott, and Martha Nussbaum – with ethical theories ranging from utilitarianism to eco-feminism. The new edition also includes provocative quotations from some of the major writers in the field. As the final chapter insists, animal ethics is more than just an "academic" question: it is intimately connected both to our understanding of what it means to be human and to pressing current issues such as food shortages, environmental degradation, and climate change.
Try this search over all volumes: moral status
Results 1-0 of 0
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Animals and the Moral Community
Bibliography Including Works Cited
1 other sections not shown
animal experimentation animal liberation animal rights animal-liberation animal-rights animal's animals for food argues argument from marginal ascribe rights basic basis behaviour believe benefits Callicott capacity Chapter claim concept conscious contractarian creatures culture Darwin death debate Descartes duties eating meat ecological ecosystems environmental ethic environmentalists experience pain feel feminist flourishing Frey genetic engineering harm human exceptionalism hunters idea individuals inherent value interests Inuit involves issue justified Kant killing liberationists lives maintains mals means meat-eating mental moral agents moral community moral rights moral status natural environment natural world non-human obligations Peter Singer philosophers pleasure Pluhar predators principle rational reason Regan rejects respect rights to animals rights view Rollin Sapontzis says sense sentient simply social society someone species speciesism sport hunting status of animals subject-of-a-life suffering telos theory tion Tom Regan traditional treat animals treatment of animals utilitarian vegetarianism virtue ethics vivisection wild animals wrong