Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation

Front Cover
F.H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard
Springer Science & Business Media, Oct 31, 2003 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 346 pages
0 Reviews
This volume of the Argumentation Library contains a collection of twenty-six theor etical contributions to the study of argumentation. Together they provide an over view of recent developments in the theory of argumentation which does justice to the theoretical variety in the field. InAnyone Who Has a View, the subject of argu mentation is approached from different angles. Both the formal and informal logical approaches and the rhetorical and communicative approaches arc represented in various ways. We arc convinced that the collection of essays as a whole will be of interest not only to those engaged directly in the study of argumentation, but also to scholars from a variety of disciplines who arc interested in the recent developments in this field. The book opens with an essay by the informal logician Robert C. Pinto. For all the differences between them, James B. Freeman, Harvey Siegel, Ralph H. Johnson, Hans V. Hansen, and J. Anthony Blair are also prominent members of that move ment. Some informal logicians either eschew or simply do not use formal methods in their approach to argumentation, while others, such as David Hitchcock, use both formal and informal methods. Erik C.W. Krabbe is a logician who proudly defends a formal dialectical approach to argumentation. Daniel H. Cohen, Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Fred J. Kauffeld, C. Scott Jacobs, Christian Kock, Christian Plantin, Sorin Stati, Chris Reed, Douglas N.
  

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Selected pages

Contents

PREFACE
1
REASONS
3
THE PRAGMATIC DIMENSION OF PREMISE ACCEPTABILITY
17
RATIONALITY AND JUDGMENT
27
THE DIALECTICAL TIER REVISITED
41
THE RABBIT IN THE HAT THE INTERNAL RELATIONS OF THE PRAGMADIALECTICAL RULESą
55
TOULMINS WARRANTS
69
METADIALOGUES
83
DISCOURSE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN ARGUMENTATIVE AND GRAMMATICAL SEQUENCES
189
DIAGRAMMING ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES AND CRITICAL QUESTIONS
195
LEGAL ARGUMENTATION THEORY AND THE CONCEPT OF LAW
213
ARGUERS OBLIGATIONS ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE
227
CHARLES S PEIRCES THEORY OF ABDUCTION AND THE ARISTOTELIAN ENTHYMEME FROM SIGNSą
237
RHETORIC AND DIALECTIC IN MARTIN LUTHER KINGS LETTER FROM BIRMINGHAM JAIL
255
ON THE ARGUMENTATIVE QUALITY OF EXPLANATORY NARRATIVES
269
THE WILES OF ARGUMENT
283

RELATIONSHIPS AMONG LOGIC DIALECTIC AND RHETORIC
91
LOGICAL FALLACIES DIALECTICAL TRANSGRESSIONS RHETORICAL SINS AND OTHER FAILURES OF RATIONALITY IN ARGUMENT...
109
A PRAGMATIC VIEW OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF
123
THE ORDINARY PRACTICE OF PRESUMING AND PRESUMPTION WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO VERACITY AND THE BURDEN OF PR...
133
TWO CONCEPTIONS OF OPENNESS IN ARGUMENTATION THEORY
147
MULTIDIMENSIONALITY AND NONDEDUCTIVENESS IN DELIBERATIVE ARGUMENTATION
157
ARGUMENTATION STUDIES IN FRANCE
173
FELICITY CONDITIONS FOR THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL AD HOMINEM
297
THE POTENTIAL CONFLICT BETWEEN NORMATIVELYGOOD ARGUMENTATIVE PRACTICE AND PERSUASIVE SUCCESS
309
THE CONCEPT OF ARGUMENT QUALITY IN THE ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL
319
HOW NARRATIVE ARGUMENTATION WORKS
337
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS
347
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

Bibliographic information