Privacy in Peril : How We are Sacrificing a Fundamental Right in Exchange for Security and Convenience: How We are Sacrificing a Fundamental Right in Exchange for Security and Convenience (Google eBook)
James B. Rule Senior Scholar Law and Society Program at the University of California Berkeley School of Law
Oxford University Press, Oct 25, 2007 - Law - 256 pages
We are all accustomed to privacy horror stories, like identity theft, where stored personal data gets misdirected for criminal purposes. But we should worry less about the illegal uses of personal data, James B. Rule argues, and worry a lot more about the perfectly legal uses of our data by the government and private industry, uses which are far more widespread and far more dangerous to our interests than we'd ever suspect. This provocative book takes readers on a probing, far-reaching tour of the erosion of privacy in American society, showing that we are often unwitting accomplices, providing personal data in exchange for security or convenience. The author reveals that in today's "information society," the personal data that we make available to virtually any organization for virtually any purpose is apt to surface elsewhere, applied to utterly different purposes. The mass collection and processing of personal information produces such tremendous efficiencies that both the public and private sector feel justified in pushing as far as they can into our private lives. And there is no easy cure. Indeed, there are many cases where privacy invasion is both hurtful to the individual and indispensable to an organization's quest for efficiency. Unrestricted snooping into citizens' personal finances really does boost the profitability of the consumer credit industry. Insurance companies really can and do make more money by using intimate private data to decide whom to insure, and what to charge. And as long as we willingly accept the pursuit of profit, or the reduction of crime, or cutting government costs as sufficient reason for intensified scrutiny over private citizens' lives, then privacy values will remain endangered. Rule offers no simple answers to this modern conundrum. Rather, he provides a sophisticated and often troubling account that promises to fundamentally alter the privacy debate.
What people are saying - Write a review
action activities American applicants Australia card Australian authorities banks Canada Canadian cell phone checkpoints ChoicePoint citizens claims CNIL collected communications consent consumer credit countries country’s court create credit accounts credit card credit grantors credit reporting credit scores crime criminal customers databases demands direct marketing e-mail efficient example federal files FISA forms of personal future of privacy government agencies government surveillance ID card identify individual industry institutions interests investigators law enforcement legislation mass surveillance monitoring movements one’s organizations Patriot Act people’s personal data personal information Peter Swire PIPEDA political pressures on privacy principles Privacy Act privacy advocates privacy codes privacy law privacy protection privacy-friendly privacy-watchers private-sector purposes record-keeping records retailers Richard Posner seek simply surveillance systems targets tax farming technologies terrorist tions today’s tracking transactions TransUnion U.S. Senate United virtually War on Terror wiretapping