The Scientific Case Against Scientific Creationism

Front Cover
iUniverse, Sep 1, 2003 - Religion - 188 pages
0 Reviews
Sociologist Jon P. Alston offers a unique and clear analysis of the weaknesses of scientific creationism and intelligent design by identifying what creationists say when they reject evidence for evolution. He demonstrates how scientific creationists accept non-scientific statements that contradict established scientific knowledge. Acceptance of anti-evolutionary knowledge also demands acceptance of a literal six-day creation and other statements contradicting scientific findings.

Few persons have read so closely the writings of scientific creationists to illustrate how anti-scientific anti-evolutionists become when they criticize the fact of evolution. Creationists are forced to develop "just-so" stories to defend their literal interpretations of Biblical scripture. Alston finds creationists cannot defend their religious beliefs using established scientific methodologies and principles.

  

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Introduction
1
Creationism
11
Evolution on Trial
35
Evolution
48
Scientific Creationism
68
The Genesis Flood
83
Noahs Ark
97
Intelligent Design
115
The Future of Creationism
133
Selected Annotated Bibliography
141
About the Author
155
References
157
Index
173
Back Cover
179
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2003)

Jon P. Alston is a professor of sociology at Texas A&M university.

Bibliographic information