American Juries: The Verdict

Front Cover
Prometheus Books, 2007 - Law - 428 pages
1 Review
Although the right to trial by jury is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution, in recent years both criminal and civil juries have been criticized as incompetent, biased, and irresponsible. For example, the O.J. Simpson criminal jury’s verdict produced a racial divide in opinions about that trial. And many Americans still hold strong views about the jury that awarded millions of dollars to a woman who spilled a cup of McDonald's coffee on herself. It’s said that there are "judicial hellholes" where local juries provide "jackpot justice" in medical malpractice and product liability cases with corporate defendants. Are these claims valid?
This monumental and comprehensive volume reviews over fifty years of empirical research on civil and criminal juries and returns a verdict that strongly supports the jury system. Rather than relying on anecdotes, Vidmar and Hans—renowned scholars of the jury system—place the jury system in its historical and contemporary context, giving the stories behind important trials while providing fact-based answers to critical questions. How do juries make decisions and how do their verdicts compare to those of trial judges and technical experts? What roles do jury consultants play in influencing trial outcomes? Can juries understand complex expert testimony? Under which circumstances do capital juries decide to sentence a defendant to die? Are juries biased against doctors and big business? Should juries be allowed to give punitive damages? How do juries respond to the insanity defense? Do jurors ignore the law?
Finally, the authors consider various suggestions for improving the way that juries are asked to carry out their duties. After briefly comparing the American jury to its counterparts in other nations, they conclude that our jury system, despite occasional problems, is, on balance, fair and democratic, and should remain an indispensable component of the judicial process for the foreseeable future.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

American Juries: The Verdict

User Review  - Not Available - Book Verdict

Here, Vidmar (law & psychology, Duke Univ.) and Hans (law, Cornell Univ.)-coauthors ofJudging the Jury -"examine what juries do and what research tells us about their performance." Chapters cover the ... Read full review

Review: American Juries: The Verdict

User Review  - Valerie - Goodreads

Neil Vidmar and I wrote this book to give an overview of the history and research on the American jury system. It's an amazing institution, when you think about it! We have plenty of law trained ... Read full review

Contents

Foreword
9
Criminal and Civil Juries in America from
41
Democratic Goals
65
Copyright

16 other sections not shown

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2007)

Neil Vidmar, PhD, (Durham, NC), is both the Russell M. Robinson II Professor of Law at Duke University School of Law and a professor of psychology at Duke University. He has published over 100 research articles and is the author, coauthor, or editor of four books including Hans and Vidmar’s widely acclaimed Judging the Jury, Medical Malpractice and the American Jury, and World Jury Systems.

Valerie P. Hans, PhD (Ithaca, NY), is Professor of Law at Cornell University. She has published more than ninety research papers and articles and is the author, coauthor or editor of five books including Business on Trial; Judging the Jury and The Jury System. She also serves on the editorial boards of major professional journals in the field of law and social science.

Bibliographic information