Wrestling with God: The Courts' Tortuous Treatment of Religion

Front Cover
Catholic University of America Press, 2006 - Law - 230 pages
0 Reviews
The Relationship Between church and state is both controversial and unsettled. For decades, the courts have vacillated dramatically in their rulings on when a particular governmental accommodation rises to the level of an impermissible state establishment of religion. Without a comprehensive theory of the First Amendment establishment clause, religion cases have devolved into a jurisprudence of minutiae. Seemingly insignificant occurrences, such as a student reading a religious story or a teacher wearing a cross on a necklace, have led to years of litigation. And because of the constant threat of judicial intrusion, a pervasive social anxiety exists about the presence of religion in American public life. This anxiety, in turn, leads to more litigation, as opposing parties constantly try to influence the fluctuating direction of the courts' religion doctrines. Courts have often treated the two religion clauses of the First Amendment as contradictory, with the free exercise clause used to protect religious practices and the establishment clause employed to limit the public expression of religious beliefs. Wrestling with God not only reconciles the relationship between the two clauses but also distinguishes them in terms of their respective purposes. Whereas the exercise clause focuses on individual freedom, the establishment clause addresses the institutional autonomy of religious organizations. Under this distinction, many cases currently falling under the establishment clause--e.g., prayer in the schools--should instead by governed by the exercise clause. Unlike many contemporary interpretations of the establishment clause, the model offered in Wrestling with God views the clause not asa check on religion but as a protection against a specific kind of religious coercion--the kind that results from governmental interference with the freedom of religious institutions. As Patrick M. Garry skillfully argues in Wrestling with God, the establishment clause does not exist for the benefit of a secular society; it exists for those religious institutions in which individuals seek to practice their beliefs.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

Wrestling with God: the courts' tortuous treatment of religion

User Review  - Not Available - Book Verdict

In a well-defined presentation, Garry (law, Univ. of South Dakota; Rediscovering a Lost Freedom ) argues first, that though the rights to practice one�s religion and to speak freely are ... Read full review

Contents

A Convoluted Maze
1
Inequality among Equals
18
Turning the First Amendment against Religion
44
Copyright

7 other sections not shown

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

About the author (2006)

Patrick M. Garry is a professor at the University of South Dakota Law School. He is a contributor to the Oxford Companion to the U.S. Supreme Court, and his previous books include Scrambling for Protection: The New Media and the First Amendment and A Nation of Adversaries: How the Litigation Explosion is Reshaping America.

Bibliographic information