Limited Livelihoods: Gender and Class in Nineteenth-century England
In the massive reorganization of lives and livelihoods that accompanied industrial capitalism in England, gender was a pivotal force. Through her analysis of industries ranging from metalworking and lacemaking to the manufacture of chocolate, Sonya Rose highlights the ways in which gender distinctions and gender relations influenced the development of capitalism.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Maintaining the Industrial Supremacy of
We Never Sought Protection for the Men Nor
Conclusions and Afterthoughts
argued artisans Ashton-under-Lyne Axminster Blackburn Standard boys breadwinner Brinton Burnley Cambridge capitalists carpet weavers census Chartist child class relations construction cotton cultural debates discourse dispute domestic E. P. Thompson employed employers England Eric Hobsbawm example Factory Acts family wage Feminist gender gender distinctions girls hired women homework hosiery hosiery industry household husbands Ibid idea ideology industrialists Joy Parr Kidderminster Shuttle lace clippers Lancashire large numbers leaders legislation lives London Low Moor machines male weavers male workers manufacturers married women Marxism masculinity men's mill motherhood mothers nineteenth century Nottingham paid paternalism paternalistic percent political Poor Law powerloom practices Preston production regulation reported responsibility rhetoric Royal Axminster Sexual Sidney Webb skilled Social History Society spinners strategies strike structured struggle Studies suggests Ten Hours Movement textile tion Trade Union Papers unionists Victorian wage earning weaving Webb Trade Union wife wives woman women workers working-class workplace workshops young