The U.S. Military: Ready for the New World Order?
Will current strategic planning give the United States the sort of military capabilities that are needed to counter threats likely to occur in the future? Using first-hand experience at the Pentagon and an army background, Lieutenant Colonel Peters outlines serious problems, offers fresh insights into the defense planning process, and makes suggestions for developing an optimal force structure for the year 2000. This analysis utilizes case studies of the Gulf War, departing from recent studies about military reform. Policymakers, experts in political and military strategy, and political scientists interested in the inner workings of government agencies will find this study a provocative one. Peters assesses the global security environment in this post-Cold War era and defines the risks and consequences likely to confront us. Employing the lens of organizational theory, he points to disjunctures between military and political policies and dysfunctional practices in the Defense Department. He describes the basic components in a force structure that would make the nation more secure militarily by the turn of the century.
2 pages matching ment in this book
Results 1-2 of 2
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Operating Security Framework for the Year 2000
The U S Joint Strategic Planning Process
5 other sections not shown
active actors adversary Air Force aircraft AirLand Battle alliances allies armor arms Army staff Army's battlefield bureaucratic politics capabilities Carrier Battle Groups Chiefs of Staff CINCs close air support Cold combat Command conflict Congress conventional forces cooperation Corps decisions defense budget defense establishment deployed deployment divisions doctrine economic effective enemy equipment Europe example force structure forecast former Soviet future global security environment heavy forces Ibid infantry influence Iraqi Joint Chiefs JSPS major Marine ment military forces military instrument mobility National Defense Staff national military strategy neocorporatist nuclear proliferation nuclear weapons option potential President programs proliferation purpose forces reduced regional requirements reserve Robert Gilpin Secretary of Defense security regime Soviet Union strategic planning process strategic planning system subconventional tactical threat to U.S. troops U.S. Army U.S. forces U.S. interests U.S. military United University Press USGPO Vietnam warfare Washington