STRATEGIC ADVANTAGES FOR THE REGIONAL FIRM | |
| | |
DISADVANTAGES FACED BY THE REGIONAL FIRM | |
| | |
IMPORTANCE OF A WELLDEFINED PLAN | |
| | |
RECENT CHALLENGES | |
| | |
THE OUTCOME OF REGIONAL BANKING EFFORTS | |
| | |
OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL ADVISORS AND THEIR ROLES | |
| | |
FINANCIAL ADVISORS IN COMPETITIVE TRANSACTIONS | |
| | |
SECURITIES DEALERS AS FINANCIAL ADVISORS | |
| | |
DETAILS REGARDING THE FINANCIAL ADVISORS FUNCTIONS | |
| | |
HOW TO HIRE A FINANCIAL ADVISOR | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
METHOD OF SALE | |
| | |
DEBATE ON THE METHOD OF SALE | |
| | |
HISTORICAL DATA ON USE OF SALE METHOD | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
HISTORY OF BOND COUNSEL | |
| | |
REVIEW OF BOND COUNSEL OPINION | |
| | |
FURTHER TAX DEVELOPMENTS | |
| | |
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS | |
| | |
STRUCTURING | |
| | |
SECURITIES LAWS | |
| | |
UNDERWRITING DOCUMENTS | |
| | |
REVIEW OF OTHER BOND DOCUMENTS | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
ARBITRAGE61 | |
| | |
PRIVATE ACTIVITY BONDS | |
| | |
OTHER MISCELLANEOUS RULES INCLUDING REFUNDINGS | |
| | |
CONCLUSION | |
| | |
THE NATURE OF THE BOND TRUSTEES DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES | |
| | |
THE MUNICIPAL BOND TRUSTEE PRECLOSING | |
| | |
ADMINISTRATION OF THE TRANSACTION BY THE BOND TRUSTEE | |
| | |
SELECTED CHALLENGES AND ISSUES FOR MUNICIPAL TRUSTEES POSTISSUANCE | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
HISTORICALLY BANKRUPTCY HAS BEEN A MECHANISM OF DEBT ADJUSTMENT IN OTHER COUNTRIES | |
| | |
BRIEF HISTORY OF MUNICIPAL BANKRUPTCY LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES | |
| | |
EXISTING MUNICIPAL BANKRUPTCY PROVISIONS | |
| | |
INITIATION OF CHAPTER 9 PROCEEDING AND EFFECT ON BONDHOLDER RIGHTS AND REMEDIES | |
| | |
UNIQUE FEATURES OF CHAPTER 9 | |
| | |
THE REQUIRED MAINTENANCE OF MUNICIPAL SERVICE DURING A MUNICIPAL BANKRUPTCY | |
| | |
LABOR CONTRACTS ARE AN IMPORTANT ELEMENT OF THE MUNICIPAL BUDGET WHOSE STATUS IN A CHAPTER 9 HAS BEEN SUBJ... | |
| | |
STATUTE GOVERNING THE REJECTION OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT IN CORPORATE CONTEXT | |
| | |
PAYMENTS TO BONDHOLDERS ARE NOT PREFERENCES | |
| | |
USE OF LETTERS OF CREDIT AS BACKING FOR MUNICIPAL AND CONDUIT OBLIGATIONS | |
| | |
POSTPETITION DISCLOSURE AND SOLICITATION | |
| | |
CONFIRMATION OF PLAN | |
| | |
CHAPTER 9 CASES FILED AS FEBRUARY 8 2007 | |
| | |
THE DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH OF LOCALLY DENOMINATED CONTRACTUAL SAVINGS POOLS AND CREDIT MARKETS | |
| | |
DECENTRALIZATION ANDOR PRIVATIZATION IS CONTINUING IN VIRTUALLY ALL EMERGING MARKETS | |
| | |
DEVELOPING FINANCIALLY SUSTAINABLE SUBNATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE CREDITS IN THE EMERGING MARKETS | |
| | |
CONCLUSIONS | |
| | |
MOODYS INVESTORS SERVICE | |
| | |
STANDARD POORS | |
| | |
FITCH RATINGS | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
REFUNDING OVERVIEW | |
| | |
ISSUES RELATING TO STRUCTURING A REFUNDING BOND ISSUE | |
| | |
WHEN SHOULD AN ISSUER REFUND PRIOR BONDS? | |
| | |
REFUNDINGS AND DERIVATIVES | |
| | |
COMPETITIVE VERSUS NEGOTIATED SALE | |
| | |
HISTORY | |
| | |
THE PROCESS OF PRIVATIZATION | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
THE UNDERWRITERS ROLE IN CONTEXT | |
| | |
WHEN DOES THE UNDERWRITER BECOME INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS? | |
| | |
THE LEADUP TO PRICING | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
TRADERS | |
| | |
TYPES OF TRADERS | |
| | |
WATCHING THE TAXABLE MARKETS | |
| | |
WHO BECOMES A TRADER? | |
| | |
A WORD ON ECOMMERCE | |
| | |
RELATIVE VALUEWHAT SHOULD A MUNICIPAL BOND BE WORTH? | |
| | |
HOW MUNICIPAL ARBITRAGE WORKS | |
| | |
WHERE DOES THE MUNICIPAL YIELD CURVES STEEPNESS COME FROM? | |
| | |
CONCLUSION | |
| | |
TENDER OPTION BONDS IN A NUTSHELL | |
| | |
WHAT ARE SWAPS AND HOW DO THEY WORK? | |
| | |
TYPES OF SWAPS AND OTHER HEDGES | |
| | |
USES AND BENEFITS | |
| | |
BUSINESS RISKS | |
| | |
HOW TO ACQUIRE A SWAP | |
| | |
LEGAL ISSUES | |
| | |
TAX ISSUES | |
| | |
DOCUMENTATION AND NEGOTIATION | |
| | |
POSTTRADE MANAGEMENT | |
| | |
GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS | |
| | |
UNDERSTANDING REGIONAL | |
| | |
TRADING | |
| | |
THE REGIONAL INSTITUTIONAL SALESPERSON AND THEIR CUSTOMERS | |
| | |
THE SKILLS OF THE SALESPERSON | |
| | |
COMMUNICATIONS AND TECHNOLOGY | |
| | |
THE LEGAL OPINION AND INDENTURE OF A MUNICIPAL BOND | |
| | |
PRICING TRANSPARENCY | |
| | |
SELLERS OF MUNICIPAL BONDS | |
| | |
THE FUTURE AS PROLOGUE | |
| | |
THE DEPOSITORY TRUST CLEARING CORPORATION | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
THE EVOLUTION OF NEWISSUE TECHNOLOGY | |
| | |
ORDER ENTRY | |
| | |
THE FUTURE | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
ORGANIZATION OF THE MSRB AND THE SCOPE OF RULEMAKING AUTHORITY | |
| | |
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS SUPERVISION RECORDKEEPING AND COMPLIANCE | |
| | |
UNIFORM PRACTICE RULES | |
| | |
MUNICIPAL MARKET TRANSPARENCY AND THE MSRB | |
| | |
FAIR DEALING AND SUITABILITY | |
| | |
MUNICIPAL SECURITIES INFORMATION LIBRARY | |
| | |
MARKET INTEGRITY | |
| | |
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING MSRB | |
| | |
FRAMEWORK OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS | |
| | |
APPLICATION TO MUNICIPAL SECURITIES | |
| | |
RULE 15c212 | |
| | |
THE ACT | |
| | |
CONCLUSION | |
| | |
GETTING STARTED | |
| | |
DOCUMENT THE PROCESS | |
| | |
REVIEW THE PROCESS | |
| | |
REVISETHE PROCESS DOCUMENTATION | |
| | |
DEFINITION OF A TAXEXEMPT MONEY MARKET FUND | |
| | |
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 2a7 | |
| | |
ELIGIBLE SECURITIES FOR TAX EXEMPT FUNDS | |
| | |
APPLICATION OF RULE 2a7 TO MUNICIPAL SECURITIES | |
| | |
POSTACQUISITION CONSTRAINTS IMPOSED BY RULE 2a7 | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
THE NEED FOR EVALUATIONS | |
| | |
TOOLS OF EVALUATION | |
| | |
ADJUSTING FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF MUNICIPAL BONDS | |
| | |
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS | |
| | |
THE FUTURE OF MUNICIPAL BOND EVALUATION | |
| | |
UNDERLYING PRINCIPLES | |
| | |
OVERVIEW OF BOND VALUATION | |
| | |
VALUATION MODEL | |
| | |
SPECIFIC ADJUSTMENTS TO THE VALUATION MODEL FOR MUNICIPAL BONDS | |
| | |
TAX ADJUSTMENTS TO THE MODEL | |
| | |
HORIZON PRICE | |
| | |
OTHER VALUES CALCULATED FROM THE MODEL | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
BREAKEVEN EQUATION FOR THE ISSUER | |
| | |
RISK ANALYSIS OF LIBORINDEXED FLOATERS | |
| | |
OTHER PERCENT LIBORINDEXED FLOATERS | |
| | |
PERCENT BMAINDEXED FLOATERS | |
| | |
PERCENT CMSINDEXED STRUCTURES | |
| | |
RISKS OF PERCENT CMS AND PERCENT BMS | |
| | |
DESCRIPTION | |
| | |
TAX TREATMENT | |
| | |
ACCOUNTING TREATMENT | |
| | |
TENDER OPTION BONDS | |
| | |
A FOURLEVEL FRAMEWORK FOR PORTFOLIO ASSETS | |
| | |
BASIC HOLDINGLEVEL ANALYSIS | |
| | |
TOTAL RETURN PERFORMANCE | |
| | |
SIMULATIONS | |
| | |
COMPLIANCE AND TARGETS | |
| | |
REPORTING | |
| | |
20 INGREDIENTS FOR SUCCESS | |
| | |
INTUITIVE PATTERNS | |
| | |
DISCOVERY | |
| | |
CAVEATS AND DISCLAIMERS | |
| | |
DESCRIPTION OF A BOND SWAP | |
| | |
OTHER TYPES OF MUNICIPAL BOND SWAPS | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
FEDERAL TAX TREATMENT OF MUNICIPAL BONDS | |
| | |
CALCULATING THE EFFECTIVE TAX RATE ON INTEREST INCOME FROM OUTOFSTATE MUNICIPAL BONDS | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
THE INVESTOR WHO BUYS THE FUND | |
| | |
TOTAL RATE OF RETURN | |
| | |
MANAGING A FUND BY RELATIVE VALUE | |
| | |
TRADITIONAL BUYERS VERSUS THE ARBITRAGEURS | |
| | |
CONCLUSION | |
| | |
HIGHYIELD BORROWERS | |
| | |
CREDIT ANALYSIS | |
| | |
SECTOR ALLOCATION | |
| | |
STORY BONDS | |
| | |
CREDIT IMPROVEMENT AND ENHANCEMENT | |
| | |
THE USE OF BENCHMARKS | |
| | |
HIGHYIELD MUNICIPAL FUND INFRASTRUCTURE | |
| | |
BUSINESS OF PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANIES | |
| | |
TOTAL RETURN VERSUS BENCHMARK | |
| | |
REGULATORY FACTORS | |
| | |
CREDIT RISK | |
| | |
INTEREST RATE RISK | |
| | |
CONCLUSION | |
| | |
RATIO CURVES | |
| | |
HEDGE FUND ACTIVITY | |
| | |
CONCLUSION | |
| | |
A LIVING BREATHING HUMAN BEING | |
| | |
TRANSPARENCY | |
| | |
UNCOVERING CLIENT OBJECTIVES | |
| | |
ARTICULATING OBJECTIVES AND SETTING PARAMETERS | |
| | |
PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT | |
| | |
UNCOVERING VALUE IN THE MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET | |
| | |
CONFRONTING INTEREST RATE RISK | |
| | |
CONFRONTING CREDIT RISK | |
| | |
CONFRONTING LIQUIDITY RISK | |
| | |
BOND SWAPPING | |
| | |
A MOST NECESSARY INVESTMENT | |
| | |
SINGLENAME MUNICIPAL CDS CONTRACT | |
| | |
USES OF MUNICIPAL CDS BY PORTFOLIO MANAGERS | |
| | |
SECOND GENERATION OF CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
CDO BASICS | |
| | |
MUNI CDOS | |
| | |
SUMMARY | |
| | |
WHICH APPROACH FOR MUNICIPAL BONDS? | |
| | |
THE BETTER APPROACH FOR MUNICIPAL BOND ATTRIBUTION | |
| | |
MATHEMATICS OF RETURNSBASED ATTRIBUTION | |
| | |
EXAMPLES OF RETURNSBASED ATTRIBUTION FOR MUNICIPAL BONDS | |
| | |
APPLYING MUNICIPAL BOND ATTRIBUTION | |
| | |