The Psychology of the Supreme Court (Google eBook)

Front Cover
Oxford University Press, Feb 16, 2006 - Political Science - 336 pages
1 Review
With the media spotlight on the recent developments concerning the Supreme Court, more and more people have become increasingly interested in the highest court in the land. Who are the justices that run it and how do they make their decisions? The Psychology of the Supreme Court by Lawrence S. Wrightsman is the first book to thoroughly examine the psychology of Supreme Court decision-making. Dr. Wrightsman's book seeks to help us understand all aspects of the Supreme Court's functioning from a psychological perspective. This timely and comprehensive work addresses many factors of influence including, the background of the justices, how they are nominated and appointed, the role of their law clerks, the power of the Chief Justice, and the day-to-day life in the Court. Dr. Wrightsman uses psychological concepts and research findings from the social sciences to examine the steps of the decision-making process, as well as the ways in which the justices seek to remain collegial in the face of conflict and the degree of predictability in their votes. Psychologists and scholars, as well as those of us seeking to unravel the mystery of The Supreme Court of the United States will find this book to be an eye-opening read.
  

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

The Least Understood Branch
3
2 The Selective Nature of Supreme Court Justices
29
3 Steps in the DecisionMaking Process
57
4 Day to Day in the Life of the Court
85
5 A Psychological Analysis of Decision Formation
109
6 The Rational Choice Model in Judicial DecisionMaking
133
7 The Bush v Gore Decision
157
8 How Individual Justices Affect Decisions
177
More Influential Than Other Justices?
199
10 Can the Courts Decisions Be Predicted?
229
11 Evaluating the Process
257
References
277
Index
299
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 2 - Judges as persons, or courts as institutions, are entitled to no greater immunity from criticism than other persons or institutions. Just because the holders of judicial office are identified with the interests of justice they may forget their common human frailties and fallibilities. There have sometimes been martinets upon the bench as there have also been...

References to this book

Bibliographic information