What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
actual Adol agent alleged Allen arise assumpsit authority Bank Barb Barn Bradstreet Co breach Brown cause of action Chicago City Clark committed common law complained conduct Conn consent consequence contract contributory negligence courts defamatory defendant defendant's duty ex delicto Exch exercise fact false imprisonment fraud Gray harm held liable husband injury intention Iowa joint tort feasors Jones jury land libel loss malicious prosecution Manufg Mass master Mees Minn N. J. Eq N. J. Law N. Y. Supp natural negligence nominal damages nuisance Ohio St ordinarily owner party Pennsylvania Co plaintiff possession Post principle proximate Q. B. Div Railroad Railroad Co Railway reasonable recognized recover recovery remedy result rule servant slander Smith statute statutory third persons tion trespass trover vide violation Wend wife wrong wrongdoer
Page 334 - ... where one by his words or conduct wilfully causes another to* believe in the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time.
Page 482 - There must be reasonable evidence of negligence; but where the thing is shown to be under the management of the defendant or his servants, and the accident is such as in the ordinary course of things does not happen if those who have the management use proper care, it affords reasonable evidence, in the absence of explanation by the defendant, that the accident arose from want of care.
Page 520 - The principle is, that a servant, when he engages to serve a master, undertakes, as between himself and his master, to run all the ordinary risks of the service, and this includes the risk of negligence on the part of a fellow-servant, whenever he is acting in discharge of his duty as servant of him who is the common master of both.
Page 71 - The principle to be deduced from all these cases is that, as a consequence of the absolute independence of every sovereign authority, and of the international comity which induces every sovereign State to respect the independence and dignity of every other sovereign State, each and every one declines to exercise by means of its courts any of its territorial jurisdiction over the person of any sovereign or ambassador of any other State, or over the public property of any State which is destined to...
Page 376 - It is a part of every man's civil rights that he be left at liberty to refuse business relations with any person whomsoever, whether the refusal rests upon reason, or is the result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice.
Page 522 - But when one person lends his servant to another for a particular employment, the servant, for anything done in that particular employment. must be dealt with as the servant of the man to whom he is lent, although he remains the general servant of the person who lent him.
Page 346 - Every contracting party has an absolute right to rely on the express statement of an existing fact, the truth of which is known to the opposite party and unknown to him, as the basis of a mutual agreement...
Page 376 - ... right to refuse to have business relations with any .person whomsoever, whether the refusal is based upon reason or is the result of whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice, and there is no law which forces a man to part with his title to his property.
Page 274 - The peace of society, and of the families composing society, and a sound public policy, designed to subserve the repose of families and the best interests of society, forbid to the minor child a right to appear in court in the assertion of a claim to civil redress for personal injuries suffered at the hands of the parent. The state, through its criminal laws, will give the minor child protection from parental violence and wrong-doing, and this is all the child can be heard to demand.