Mind, Text, and Commentary: Noetic Exegesis in Origen of Alexandria, Didymus the Blind, and Evagrius Ponticus

Front Cover
Peter Lang, 2010 - Religion - 416 pages
0 Reviews
Scholarship on early Christian exegesis is full of puzzlement at the commentator's apparent lack of concern for the literal or historical meaning of the text, usually explained as the result of an illegitimate allegorical method. This study comes to grips with the particularities of this type of interpretation by using tools from ethnography and literary criticism. By analysing the commentator's interpretive assumptions and the framework of significances within which the commentaries were produced and read, the author is able to solve a chronic problem in the study of early Christian exegesis. Further, she articulates the social context of the performance of noetic exegesis and its significance for monastic teachers, philosophers, and their audiences.
  

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Chapter 2
49
Chapter 5
113
Interpretive Maintenance of tlie Authority of tlie Text
116
Chapter 3
129
Under What Conditions Was Noetic Exegesis Considered
149
Hie Paradox of Written Revelation
198
Chapter 4
221
The Social and Institutional Context
299
Chapter 6
365
Bibliography
387
Acknowledgements
415
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2010)

The Author: Blossom Stefaniw grew up in both the United States and Papua New Guinea, completing her undergraduate studies in 1999. After taking a Masters of Theology at the University of Wales, she completed her Ph.D. in Religious Studies at the University of Erfurt (Germany). She is currently pursuing postdoctoral research.

Bibliographic information