Advocates of physician-assisted suicide insist that terminally ill individuals should have the right to choose when to end their suffering. Opponents respond that if the practice becomes acceptable, society will pressure patients into choosing death instead of providing them with quality end-of-life care. This insightful anthology examines the debate over whether medical personnel should be involved in hastening the death of the terminally ill.
1 page matching disabilities in this book
Results 1-1 of 1
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
On the Take: How Medicine's Complicity with Big Business Can Endanger Your ...
Jerome P. Kassirer
No preview available - 2005
PhysicianAssisted Suicide Is Not Ethical
Access to PhysicianAssisted Suicide Is an Unalienable Right
5 other sections not shown
active euthanasia advance directives aid in dying argue argument assisted suicide autonomy believe better end-of-life Boehnlein Brock Cheney Cheney's choice choose cian cide clinical depression competent patient concern Death with Dignity debate Dignity Act disabilities dying patients e-mail end their lives England Journal fear forgo life support hasten death healer Hemlock Society hospice human incompetent individual issue Jack Kevorkian Journal of Medicine Kevorkian Legalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide lethal dose lethal injection life-sustaining treatment Lou Gehrig's disease mentally competent morally justified Netherlands opponents option Oregon patient's death permitting person physi physician physician aid physician-assisted dy physician-assisted suicide potential for abuse professional psychiatrist public policy reason refuse Reprinted with permission request respirator safeguards self-determination sisted social suffering suicide and euthanasia suicide or euthanasia Supreme Court surrogates terminal sedation terminally ill patients thanasia Thomas Youk tients values voluntary wishes wrongness of killing Youk