Medical Risk and the Right to an Informed Consent in Clinical Care and Clinical Research |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 3
Page vi
... codes among individual researchers , through its development in the Nuremberg Code and Declaration of Helsinki to its current status in U.S. regulation and its continuing evolution through decision making by institutional review boards ...
... codes among individual researchers , through its development in the Nuremberg Code and Declaration of Helsinki to its current status in U.S. regulation and its continuing evolution through decision making by institutional review boards ...
Page 128
... Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki The Nuremberg Code excluded research on at least three groups : the very young ; the unconscious ; and those who lacked legal competency for decision making.10 The World Medical Association ...
... Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki The Nuremberg Code excluded research on at least three groups : the very young ; the unconscious ; and those who lacked legal competency for decision making.10 The World Medical Association ...
Page 131
... Nuremberg Code , from Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10 Military Tribunal I , 1947 ) . Washington , D.C .: U.S. Government Printing Office , 1948-9 . 11. " Declaration of ...
... Nuremberg Code , from Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10 Military Tribunal I , 1947 ) . Washington , D.C .: U.S. Government Printing Office , 1948-9 . 11. " Declaration of ...
Contents
MEDICAL RISK AND INFORMED CONSENT | 1 |
Preface | 7 |
Chapter | 11 |
Copyright | |
11 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
alternatives appellate court asked Bethlem Royal Hospital biases Canterbury court Canterbury decision chance cian clinical research study cognitive communication competent concept consent in clinical court argued court decision Declaration of Helsinki disclose discuss doctor drug and product duty ethical expert Faden and Beauchamp Federal Regulations focused harm hospital human subjects Ibid influence information disclosure information patients informed consent institutional review board involved issues judgment judicial Lord Diplock Lord Scarman low probability medical decision medical intervention medical risk occur operation participation patient decision patient informedness patient preferences patient-physician decision patient-physician relationship patients and physicians patients understand percent perspective physi placebo potential principal investigator problems procedure professional standard prostate cancer question radiation therapy rational reasonable person standard recommended regarding risk disclosure risks and benefits Salgo scientific Sidaway South Western Reporter specific Stevens Johnson Syndrome surgeon surgery tardive dyskinesia Texas Supreme Court therapeutic therapy tion treatment U.S. courts Veatch versus