Kuhn Vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science

Front Cover
Columbia University Press, 2004 - Biography & Autobiography - 143 pages
8 Reviews

Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions has sold over a million copies in more than twenty languages and has remained one of the ten most cited academic works for the past half century. In contrast, Karl Popper's seminal book The Logic of Scientific Discovery has lapsed into relative obscurity. Although the two men debated the nature of science only once, the legacy of this encounter has dominated intellectual and public discussions on the topic ever since.

Almost universally recognized as the modern watershed in the philosophy of science, Kuhn's relativistic vision of shifting paradigms -- which asserted that science was just another human activity, like art or philosophy, only more specialized -- triumphed over Popper's more positivistic belief in science's revolutionary potential to falsify society's dogmas. But has this victory been beneficial for science? Steve Fuller argues that not only has Kuhn's dominance had an adverse impact on the field but both thinkers have been radically misinterpreted in the process. This debate raises a vital question: Can science remain an independent, progressive force in society, or is it destined to continue as the technical wing of the military-industrial complex? Drawing on original research -- including the Kuhn archives at MIT -- Fuller offers a clear account of "Kuhn vs. Popper" and what it will mean for the future of scientific inquiry.

  

What people are saying - Write a review

User ratings

5 stars
0
4 stars
3
3 stars
3
2 stars
1
1 star
1

Review: Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle For The Soul Of Science (Revolutions in Science)

User Review  - Tiredstars - Goodreads

"How can a mere philosopher devise criteria distinguishing between good and bad science, knowing it is an inutterable mystic secret of the Royal Society?" - Imre Lakatos (1973) I don't know much about ... Read full review

Review: Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle For The Soul Of Science (Revolutions in Science)

User Review  - Matthew - Goodreads

Kuhn's basic concept was “paradigm”, which is the “idea that scientific inquiry is anchored in an exemplar that researchers then use as a model for future investigations”. Kuhn sees a paradigm as an ... Read full review

Contents

CHAPTER
12
CHAPTER 4
25
CHAPTER 6
40
CHAPTER 9
53
CHAPTER 12
70
The Rationalist Left
87
CHAPTER 16
102
Glossary
123
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (2004)

Edward D. berkowitz is professor of history and public policy and public administration at George Washington University. He is the author of eight books and the editor of three collections. During the seventies he served as a staff member of the President's Commission for a National Agenda, helping President Carter plan for a second term that never came to be.

Bibliographic information