On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason

Front Cover
Open Court Publishing, 1974 - Philosophy - 260 pages
3 Reviews
"Schopenhauer's analyses of causation and related concepts . . . rival and probably surpass in their depth and brilliance the more celebrated discussions of David Hume. Where Hume grossly oversimplified these problems and left them riddled with paradoxes, Schopenhauer disentangled them and shed light on what had seemed hopelessly dark." —Richard Taylor, University of Rochester
  

What people are saying - Write a review

Review: On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason

User Review  - Onyango Makagutu - Goodreads

Well written. Work of a genius Read full review

Review: On the Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason

User Review  - Cameron - Goodreads

The principle of sufficient reason is one of the great metaphysical controversies that has engaged philosophers from Aristotle to Spinoza. Simply put, the principle states that for everything that ... Read full review

Contents

Its Application in the Present Case
2
Summary of the Main Points
9
Spinoza
17
Leibniz
24
Inadequacy of Previous Statements
39
On the First Class of Objects for
45
Principle of Sufficient Reason of Becoming
52
A Priori Nature of the Concept of Causality
75
Principle of Sufficient Reason and Being
194
Ground or Reason of Being in Space
195
Ground or Reason of Being in Time Arithmetic
197
Geometry
198
On the Fourth Class of Objects for the Subject and the Form of the Principle of Sufficient Reason Ruling Therein
207
Subject of Willing
210
Willing Law of Motivation
212
Influence of the Will on Knowledge
214

On the Immediate Object
121
On the Improper Use of the Law of Causality
133
On the Second Class of Objects
145
Representatives of Concepts The Power
152
Logical Truth
157
Empirical Truth
159
Transcendental Truth
160
Metalogical Truth
161
The Faculty of Reason Vernunft
171
On the Third Class of Objects for the Subject and the Form of the Principle of Sufficient Reason Ruling Therein
193
Memory
216
General Remarks and Results
221
Time Relation Between Ground and Consequent
222
Reciprocity of Grounds and Reasons
224
Necessity
225
Series of Grounds and Consequents
227
Every Science Has for its Guidance One of the Forms of the Principle of Sufficient Reason Rather than the Others
230
Two Main Results
231
Selected Bibliography
257
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (1974)

Arthur Schopenhauer traveled in childhood throughout Europe and lived for a time in Goethe's Weimar, where his mother had established a salon that attracted many of Europe's leading intellectuals. As a young man, Schopenhauer studied at the University of Gottingen and in Berlin, where he attended the lectures of Fichte and Schleiermacher. Schopenhauer's first work was The Fourfold Root of the Principle of Sufficient Reason (1813), followed by a treatise on the physiology of perception, On Vision and Colors (1816). When Schopenhauer wrote his principal work, The World as Will and Idea (1819), he was confident that it was a work of great importance that would soon win him fame, but in this he was badly disappointed. In 1819 he arranged to hold a series of philosophical lectures at the same time as those of the newly arrived professor Hegel, whom Schopenhauer despised (calling him, among other creative epithets, an "intellectual Caliban"). This move resulted only in further humiliation for Schopenhauer, since no one showed up to hear him. Schopenhauer continued to be frustrated in repeated attempts to achieve recognition. In 1839 and 1840 he submitted essays on freedom of the will and the foundation of morality to competitions sponsored by the Royal Danish Academy but he won no prize, even when his essay was the only entry in the competition. In 1844 he published a second volume of The World as Will and Idea, containing developments and commentaries on the first. Around 1850, toward the end of his life, Schopenhauer's philosophy began to receive belated recognition, and he died in the confidence that his long-awaited and deserved fame had finally come. Schopenhauer's philosophy exercised considerable influence in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, not only among academic philosophers but even more among artists and literati. This may be in part because, unlike his German idealist contemporaries, Schopenhauer is a lucid and even witty writer, whose style consciously owes more to Hume than to Kant. Schopenhauer's philosophy is founded on the idea that reality is Will--a single, insatiable, objectless striving that manifests itself in the world of appearance as a vast multiplicity of phenomena, engaged in an endless and painful struggle with one another. He saw the same vision in the texts of Indian religions---Vedanta and Buddhism---which he regarded as vastly superior to Western monotheism. Schopenhauer's theory of the empirical world is an idealism, in which the doctrines of Kant are identified with those of Berkeley. In aesthetic enjoyment Schopenhauer saw a form of knowledge that is higher than ordinary empirical knowledge because it is a disinterested contemplation of the forms or essences of things, rather than a cognition of causal connections between particulars driven by the will's interest in control and domination. True salvation, however, lies in an intuitive insight into the evil of willing, which in its highest manifestations is capable of completely extinguishing the will in a state of nirvana. In his perceptive development of the psychological consequences of his theory, Schopenhauer gives particular emphasis to the way in which our knowledge and behavior are insidiously manipulated by our unconscious volition; this stress, plus the central role he gives to sexuality in his theory of the will, contains much that is found later in Freud (who acknowledged that Schopenhauer had anticipated his theory of repression). Schopenhauer's main influence on twentieth-century philosophy, however, was mediated by Nietzsche, whose theory of the will to power added a poignant twist by committing itself to the affirmation of the will while still conceiving it in essentially the same way---insatiable, painful, predatory, deceptive, and subversive of rational thought---which it had been in Schopenhauer's metaphysical pessimism.

Bibliographic information