Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences
There is an ongoing perception that public accountability in modern-day governance is in 'crisis', caused by globalization and the increasing power of private economic interests. This book responds to that idea, providing the most comprehensive survey to date of how different organizations hold persons acting in the public interest to account, and the various problems they face. The book shows how key issues, such as public-mindedness, democracy and responsibility, and structures, such as bureaucracy, markets and transparency, adopt radically different and sometimes contradictory interpretations when viewed from different experiential perspectives. It also demonstrates how underlying all this are core communities of experiences that bind these diverse interpretations and perspectives into a complex web of mutual interaction and influence. The book includes studies not only of Anglo-American experiences, but also of the experiences of foreign and transnational organizations: NGOs, transnational resistance movements, the Indonesian labor movement, and the Chinese Parliament.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
THE MYTH OF NONBUREAUCRATIC
EXTENDING PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY
ACCOUNTABILITY AND INSTITUTIONAL
Rewards and Sanctions
EMERGING LABOR MOVEMENTS AND
ACCOUNTING FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IN
THE MARK OF RESPONSIBILITY WITH A
TECHNOCRATIC V CONVIVIAL
UNDERSTANDING NGOBASED SOCIAL
PROBLEMSOLVING COURTS AND THE
PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY IN ALIEN
ability accountabil accountability mechanisms accountability regimes accountability template actions administrative government argue argument basic responsibility behavior chapter China’s Cochabamba competition concept concerns constitutional accountability context contracting convivial accountability countability crisis decisionmaking decisions demands democracy democratic devolution diminished responsibility disability insurance drug courts economic effective electoral environment example experimentalist federal firms forms of accountability functions global hierarchical Hobbesian ical IFOAM implementation institutional design interests ISEAL Alliance ISEAL members issues judges judicial review labor NGOs labor union legitimacy ment modality of control monitoring negotiated rulemaking neoliberal networks one’s operate organizations participation particular parties perspective political private actors problem-solving courts problems procedural public accountability public governance question reasons reform regulation regulatory model restorative justice role simply social society stakeholders standards structures suggests Suharto technocratic accountability tion traditional triadic logic union democracy workers