The History of Redemption (Google eBook)

Front Cover
Sovereign Grace Publishers,, Dec 1, 2000 - Religion - 364 pages
0 Reviews
  

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

I
13
II
27
III
28
IV
46
V
54
VI
68
VII
93
VIII
124
XIII
179
XIV
182
XV
202
XVII
211
XVIII
213
XIX
214
XX
224
XXI
228

IX
157
X
169
XI
170
XII
178
XXIII
328
XXIV
344
Copyright

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2000)

In 1716 Edwards was admitted to Yale at the remarkable age of thirteen. After he graduated in 1722, he spent four years there pursuing theological interests, teaching, and completing his master's degree. In 1727 ,Edwards complied with his grandfather's request and traveled to Northhampton, Massachusetts to be his assistant in his church. A committed scholar of John Calvin and the early Puritan theologians, as well as of the writings of John Locke and Isaac Newton, Edwards pursued a theology founded on two seemingly contradictory themes---a desire to return to the Calvinist tradition, as well as a desire to include the insights of contemporary Enlightenment philosophy. While Edwards's theological formulations were not completely developed until the 1750s, his lifetime pursuit of these ideas profoundly influenced the Puritan period of religious revival known as the Great Awakening. Though Edwards's provocative theology and sermons occasionally invoked fire and brimstone, as in the famous Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God (1741), his sermons generally moved parishioners to faith through the employment of positive imagery, as in God Glorified in Man's Dependence (1731). In spite of his successes during the Great Awakening, Edwards was ultimately involved in a controversy that led to his dismissal at the Northhampton parish in 1750. Viewed as too progressive by a faction of the church known as the Old Lights, Edwards stepped down after delivering his famous Farewell Sermon (1750), in which he declared that God would ultimately determine whether Edwards had been right or wrong

Bibliographic information