Charitable Choice at Work: Evaluating Faith-Based Job Programs in the States (Google eBook)
Georgetown University Press, 2006 - Political Science - 247 pages
Too often, say its critics, U.S. domestic policy is founded on ideology rather than evidence. Take "Charitable Choice": legislation enacted with the assumption that faith-based organizations can offer the best assistance to the needy at the lowest cost. The Charitable Choice provision of the 1996 Welfare Reform Act -- buttressed by President Bush's Faith-Based Initiative of 2000 -- encouraged religious organizations, including congregations, to bid on government contracts to provide social services. But in neither year was data available to prove or disprove the effectiveness of such an approach. Charitable Choice at Work fills this gap with a comprehensive look at the evidence for and against faith-based initiatives. Sheila Suess Kennedy and Wolfgang Bielefeld review the movement's historical context along with legal analysis of constitutional concerns including privatization, federalism, and separation of church and state. Using both qualitative and, where possible, statistical data, the authors analyze the performance of job placement programs in three states with a representative range of religious, political, and demographic traits -- Massachusetts, Indiana, and North Carolina. Throughout, they focus on measurable outcomes as they compare non-faith-based with faith-based organizations, nonprofits with for-profits, and the logistics of contracting before and after Charitable Choice. Among their findings: in states where such information is available, the composition of social service contractor pools has changed very little. Reflecting their varied political cultures, states have funded programs differently. Faith-based organizations have not been eager to seek government contracts, perhaps wary of additional legal restraints and reporting burdens. The authors conclude that faith-based organizations appear no more effective than secular organizations at government-funded social service provision, that there has been no dramatic change in the social welfare landscape since Charitable Choice, and that the constitutional concerns of its detractors may be valid. This empirical study penetrates the fog of the culture wars, moving past controversy over the role of religion in public life to offer pragmatic suggestions for policymakers and organizations who must decide how best to assist the needy.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Asking the Right Questions
What We Have Learned
The Implementation of Charitable Choice in the States
The Role of FaithBased Service Providers
The Management of FaithBased Service Providers
administration Amendment American approach beliefs capacity caseworkers chapter Charitable Choice church clients congregations constitutional constitutionally contractors County Court defined deliver differences effective efforts ernment establishment clause evaluation faith based faith influence faith orientation faith-based and secular Faith-Based Initiative faith-based organizations faith-based providers Farnsley FBO managers FBOs federal fiscal Fourteenth Amendment government agencies government funding holistic identified IMPACT contracts implementation included Instrumental Variable involved issues IUPUI job training know IF YES management challenges Marion County ment Monsma North Carolina organizational outcomes participation percent placement political culture problems programs PRWORA public managers questions Recruiting/keeping relationship religion religious organizations religious providers religious social service religiously affiliated reported responses Salvation Army sample Section 104 secular providers service delivery SFB providers significant social welfare staff state's strongly faith-based tax dollars Teen Challenge tion variables volunteers welfare reform