Clio confused: troubling aspects of historical study from the perspective of U.S. history

Front Cover
Greenwood Press, 1995 - History - 158 pages
0 Reviews
Nations and other political entities are inadequate bases for studying the human past, because the other aspects of human life are not organized along the same lines as these political entities. All communities, including local ones, are amoeba-like, changing size and shape as we observe and probe them. Historians can improve the way they generalize about the past by tailoring their conclusions to the actual evidence they use. By using an array of historical questions of interest to scholars in all of the humanistically oriented disciplines, historians can offer more profound interpretations of their subjects, rather than confining themselves to an explanation of how and why human life evolves or persists through time and space. By doing so, historians can also significantly extend their influence among the general population.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

COMMON CONFUSIONS FROM
5
Inconsistencies
11
Traditions
21
Copyright

9 other sections not shown

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1995)

DAVID J. RUSSO is a Professor of U.S. History at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Bibliographic information