Saint Thomas and the Problem of Evil

Front Cover
Marquette University Press, 1942 - Philosophy - 46 pages

From inside the book

Selected pages

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 40 - Dicendum quod, sicut dictum est, voluntas sine adhibitione regulae rationis vel legis divinae, est causa peccati. Hoc autem quod est non adhibere regulam rationis vel legis divinae, secundum se non habet rationem mali, nec poenae, nec culpae, antequam applicetur ad acturn.
Page 43 - ... bonum, et tamen voluntas in illud tendit quasi in proprium bonum. Hic autem ordinis defectus voluntarius est ; nam in potestate ipsius voluntatis est velle et non velle ; itemque est in potestate ipsius quod ratio actu consideret vel a consideratione desistat aut quod hoc vel illud consideret. Nec tamen iste defectus est malum morale ; si enim ratio nihil consideret vel consideret bonum quodcumque, nondum est peccatum quousque voluntas in finem indebitum tendat ; quod jam est voluntatis actus.
Page 19 - Without fallible freedom there can be no created freedom; without created freedom there can be no love in mutual friendship between God and creature; without love in mutual friendship between God and creature, there can be no supernatural transformation of the creature into God, no entering of the creature into the joy of his Lord. Sin, — evil, — is the price of glory.
Page 41 - ... et principaliter invenitur; et rationabiliter, quum ex hoc actus moralis dicatur quia voluntarius est. In actu igitur voluntatis quaerenda est radix et origo peccati moralis. «Videtur autem hanc inquisitionem consequi difficultas. Quum enim actus deficiens proveniat propter defectum activi principii, oportet praeintelligere defectum in voluntate ante peccatum morale. Qui quidem defectus, si sit naturalis, semper inhaeret voluntati ; semper igitur voluntas in agendo moraliter peccabit, quod actus...
Page 43 - Dicendum quod voluntarium dicitur quod est a voluntate. Ab aliquo autem dicitur esse aliquid dupliciter: uno modo directe, quod scilicet procedit ab aliquo inquantum est agens, sicut calefactio a calore; alio modo indirecte, ex hoc ipso quod non agit...
Page 40 - Dicendum quod malum habet causam deficientem aliter in rebus voluntariis, et naturalibus. Agens enim naturale producit effectum suum talem quale Ipsum est, nisi impediatur ab aliquo extrinseco ; et hoc ipsum est quidem defectus eius.
Page 43 - Alio modo, indirecte, ex hoc ipso quod non agit ; sicut submersio navis dicitur esse a gubernatore, inquantum desistit a gubernando. Sed sciendum quod non semper id quod sequitur ad defectum actionis, reducitur sicut in causam in agens, ex eo quod non agit ; sed solum tune cum potest et débet agere. Si enim gubernator non posset navem dirigere, vel non esset ei commissa gubernatio navis: non imputaretur ei navis submersio, quae per absentiam gubernatoris contingeret. «Quia igitur voluntas, volendo...
Page 22 - In that case, what is the cause of evil of action ? What, in the order of metaphysical connections, is it that causes free action to be bad, or, if I may be allowed to express it this way, bitten by nothingness? This is a particularly difficult problem. I believe St. Thomas is the only thinker who has considered it in all its difficulty, and I think the solution he proposes is one of the most original of his philosophical discoveries.
Page 41 - Si autem defectus sit voluntarius, jam est peccatum morale, ui jus causa iterum inquirenda restabit ; et sic ratio in infinitum deducet. Oportet ergo dicere quod defectus in voluntate praeexistens non sit naturalis, ne sequatur voluntatem in quolibet actu peccare ; neque etiam casualis, et fortuitus; non enim esset in nobis morale peccatum; casualia enim sunt impraemeditata et extra rationem. Est igitur voluntarius, non tarnen peccatum morale, ne cogamus in infinitum procedere.
Page 41 - Relinquitur igitur quod morale vitium in solo actu voluntatis primo et principaliter invenitur ; et rationabiliter, quum ex hoc actus moralis dicatur quia voluntarius est. In actu igitur voluntatis quaerenda est radix et origo peccati moralis. « Videtur autem hanc inquisitionem consequi difficultas. Quum enim actus deficiens proveniat propter defectum activi principii, oportet praeintelligere defectum in voluntate ante peccatum morale. Qui quidem defectus, si sit naturalis, semper inhaeret voluntati...

References to this book

Speculum, Volume 17
Edward Kennard Rand
No preview available - 1942
Speculum, Volume 17
Edward Kennard Rand
No preview available - 1942

About the author (1942)

T. S. Eliot once called Jacques Maritain "the most conspicuous figure and probably the most powerful force in contemporary philosophy." His wife and devoted intellectual companion, Raissa Maritain, was of Jewish descent but joined the Catholic church with him in 1906. Maritain studied under Henri Bergson but was dissatisfied with his teacher's philosophy, eventually finding certainty in the system of St. Thomas Aquinas. He lectured widely in Europe and in North and South America, and lived and taught in New York during World War II. Appointed French ambassador to the Vatican in 1945, he resigned in 1948 to teach philosophy at Princeton University, where he remained until his retirement in 1953. He was prominent in the Catholic intellectual resurgence, with a keen perception of modern French literature. Although Maritain regarded metaphysics as central to civilization and metaphysically his position was Thomism, he took full measure of the intellectual currents of his time and articulated a resilient and vital Thomism, applying the principles of scholasticism to contemporary issues. In 1963, Maritain was honored by the French literary world with the national Grand Prize for letters. He learned of the award at his retreat in a small monastery near Toulouse where he had been living in ascetic retirement for some years. In 1967, the publication of "The Peasant of the Garonne" disturbed the French Roman Catholic world. In it, Maritain attacked the "neo-modernism" that he had seen developing in the church in recent decades, especially since the Second Vatican Council. According to Jaroslav Pelikan, writing in the Saturday Review of Literature, "He laments that in avant-garde Roman Catholic theology today he can 'read nothing about the redeeming sacrifice or the merits of the Passion.' In his interpretation, the whole of the Christian tradition has identified redemption with the sacrifice of the cross. But now, all of that is being discarded, along with the idea of hell, the doctrine of creation out of nothing, the infancy narratives of the Gospels, and belief in the immortality of the human soul." Maritain's wife, Raissa, also distinguished herself as a philosophical author and poet. The project of publishing Oeuvres Completes of Jacques and Raissa Maritain has been in progress since 1982, with seven volumes now in print.

Bibliographic information