University Funding: Information on the Role of Peer Review at NSF and NIH : Fact Sheet for the Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate
The Office, 1987 - Federal aid to research - 52 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Who are the peer reviewers and how are they
What is the role of agency officials
4 other sections not shown
1986 funding millions ad hoc mail agency officials APPENDIX VII assess Award Decision Process award selection biomedical research competitive research cronyism dual review EPSCOR Evaluation Staff Studies external peer reviewers fact sheet fairness federal research funds fiscal year 1986 funding decisions groups and institutions high-risk research hoc mail review infrastructure initial peer review initial review groups innovative institute staff interdisciplinary mechanisms minority institutions minority investigators National Science Foundation NIH executive secretaries NIH officials NIH peer review NIH PROJECT SELECTION NSF and NIH NSF Award Decision NSF officials NSF Peer NSF program officers NSF's oversight Peer Review System percent priority score program officer's recommendation program relevance project selection process Rand Corporation research program research support role rotators Rustum Roy science and engineering scientific and technical scientific merit scientists selecting peer reviewers separately budgeted programs September 25 study sections summary statements targets technical merit undergraduate institutions underrepresented groups women and minorities