The Revision Revised: Three Articles Reprinted from the Quarterly Review. 1. The New Greek Text. 2. The New English Version. 3. Westcott and Hort's New Textual Theory, to which is Added a Reply to Bishop Ellicott's Pamphlet in Defence of the Revisers and Their Greek Text of the New Testament ...

John William Burgon

J. Murray, 1883 - Bible - 549 pages

What people are saying

User Review -

OCLC: 3020184
Related Subjects: Bible. -- N.T. -- Versions -- Revised -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.
LCCN:BS

Contents

• The New Greek Text: 1
• b The oldest copies of the N T b and N which are among: 9
• c Manuscripts Versions and Fathersour three great helps: 18
• Two grounds of complaint against the Revisers: 97
• The New English Version: 113
• c Bp Ellicott and Dr Westcott had already declared see page xlii: 124
• e Unfairness of the Revisers in stating the evidence: 131
• Mechanical uniformity of rendering a grievous mistake: 151
• A specimen 2 S Peter L 57: 170
• Mistaken principle of Translation: 187
• Everlasting unfairly excluded as the rendering of alaviot: 206
• ? The Evil One improperly introduced into the Lords Prayer: 214
• to The Authorized Version is better than the Revision: 221
• o Case of the Revision hopeless: 227
• a The general disappointment occasioned by the Revision: 235
• c Dr Hort takes no account of gross Textual errors which have: 248
• u He vaunts the factor of Genealogy a term to be explained: 254
• The one object of all this wild writing shown to be the glorifi: 304
• xxxvm TABLE OF CONTENTS: 308
• A Dr Hort is for shutting us up for ever within Codices b and M: 312
• t And thus we part company from our learned and accomplished: 320
• k Dialogue of the Reviewer with a Friendly Criticwho: 328
• ra The only trustworthy method of Textual Criticism explained: 339
• n The case of the Codex Alexandrinus a stated: 345
• p Westcott and Horts method of dealing with the Inspired Text: 362
• Letter to Bishop Ellicott: 369
• 6 Nothing says the Bishop can be more unjust on the part: 399
• e Suggested AllocutionBp Ellicott to Drs Westoott and Hort: 413
• e Three of these Readings singled out for special laborious study: 420
• 1 Testimony of the Copies to 1 Timothy iii 16 Of Cod a: 431
• 2 Testimony of the Versions concerning 1 Tim iii 16: 449
• 3 Testimony of the Fathers concerning 1 Tim iii 16: 455
• The argument e silentio considered: 469
• I Sum of the evidence in favour of pvarriptov 5 in 1: 479
• III Sum of the evidence in favour of eds icpavepaBrj: 485
• Internal evidence for reading eot ipavtpi6i in 1 Tim iii: 497
• h Forecast of the probable Future of the Revision of 1881: 508
• i Review of the entire subject and of our respective positions: 514
• Appendix of Additional Sacred Codices: 521
• Postscript showing that the traditional Reading of 1 Timothy iii: 528

Bibliographic information

• Title: The Revision Revised: Three Articles Reprinted from the Quarterly Review. 1. The New Greek Text. 2. The New English Version. 3. Westcott and Hort's New Textual Theory, to which is Added a Reply to Bishop Ellicott's Pamphlet in Defence of the Revisers and Their Greek Text of the New Testament ...
• Author: John William Burgon
• Publisher: J. Murray, 1883
• Original from: Harvard University
• Digitized: Nov 17, 2006
• Length: 549 pages