Aggressive Response Completion as a Function of Retaliation and TAT Exposure |
Contents
Personality Determinants of Aggression Expression | 22 |
Present Experiments | 28 |
METHOD AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN | 31 |
11 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
administered afforded aggression expressed aggressive imagery aggressive picture pull aggressive response sequence Analysis of Variance anger arousal anger instigator angered subjects Appendix behavior Berkowitz cards with high completion condition consisted Correlations direct retaliation directly duration Edwards Aggression Score effect exposed exposure expression of aggression factor finding found in Table Four Experimental Groups frustration given high aggressive picture high or low High Retaliation High TAT Low higher Hokanson hostility hypotheses increased indicates individual insult irrespective less low aggressive picture Low Retaliation magnitude manipulation Mean SD Mean Mean Shock Intensity measure non-significant obtained opportunity performed Personal picture pull TAT Pooled TAT Aggression position present produced Psychology pull TAT cards Question Questionnaire Items rated respect Response Characteristics scaling SD Mean SD Shock Intensity Scores significant similar Social subsequent suggest task TAT aggression scores TAT Low TAT TAT stories Test Truncated Groups yielded zero