The Moral Compass of the American Lawyer: Truth, Justice, Power, and Greed

Front Cover
Random House Publishing Group, Sep 5, 2000 - Law - 288 pages
0 Reviews
These are perilous times for Americans who need access to the legal system. Too many lawyers blatantly abuse power and trust, engage in reckless ethical misconduct, grossly unjust billing practices, and dishonesty disguised as client protection. All this has undermined the credibility of lawyers and the authority of the legal system. In the court of public opinion, many lawyers these days are guiltier than the criminals or giant corporations they defend.

Is the public right? In this eye-opening, incisive book, Richard Zitrin and Carol Langford, two practicing lawyers and distinguished law professors, shine a penetrating light on the question everyone is asking: Why do lawyers behave the way they do? All across the country, lawyers view certain behavior as "ethical" while average citizens judge that same conduct "immoral." Now, with expert analysis of actual cases ranging from murder to class action suits, Zitrin and Langford investigate lawyers' behavior and its impact on our legal system. The result is a stunningly clear-eyed exploration of law as it is practiced in America today--and a cogent, groundbreaking program for legal reform.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

The moral compass of the American lawyer: truth, justice, power, and greed

User Review  - Not Available - Book Verdict

In this book about morality and American lawyering, Zitrin and Langford, practicing California lawyers and law professors, raise key questions about the behavior of many in their profession. They find ... Read full review

Contents

Part Two Power and Its Abuse
49
Part Three Greed and Deceit
119
Lawyers as Liars
161
Copyright

4 other sections not shown

Common terms and phrases

ABA Journal accused adversary system adversary theorem African-American against ambulance chaser American American Bar Association Angela Jackson argue Armani Arthur Miller asbestos asked Association Atticus Finch attorney-client privilege attorneys Baker & McKenzie behavior Belge Ben Gazzara benzene billable billable hour billing breast implant California charges Charles Keating claims class action class members client conduct contingency fees corporate counsel Courier-Journal Credit Suisse criminal defense Dalkon Shield Dallas Morning David Luban defense lawyers didn't discovery documents don't Dow Corning Du Pont ethics rules evidence federal fees Fentress filed firm's Ford Pinto Frank Armani Freedman Gary Weiss guilty Hamilton County heart valves Hopman Hutner in-house insanity defense insurance company intrauterine device issue it's Jimmy Stewart John O'Quinn John Potter Johnnie Cochran judge jurors jury justice kente cloth Kentucky Supreme Court law firm Law Journal law school lawsuits Lee Sarokin Legal Ethics legal fiction Liggett Group Lilly litigation Lloyd Doggett Luxor Marcia Clark Mark Chavez Melvin Belli memo ment Michael Josephson million moral NAACP National Law Journal never NHTSA O.J. Simpson often partners Paul Smith Perry Mason personal injury lawyers Petz plaintiffs police Potter Products Liability Profes professional professor protect Prozac Public Citizen race card Ralph Nader represent richewski Richie Rob Graham Robert Garrow Robert Shapiro Rodney King Sabrina Jones Samuel Dash San Francisco Scholer secrecy secret settle settlement Sharon SLAPP Steve Lowery Supreme Court Swaine & Moore Texas Supreme Court theophylline tion told tort reform Tovarich trial lawyers truth TWA Flight 800 U.S. Supreme Court Unocal USAir Valencia ValuJet victims war of attrition whistle-blowing William Reece York Zitrin Zomax

About the author (2000)

Richard M. Zitrin, a partner in the San Francisco firm of Zitrin & Mastromonaco, LLP, is an adjunct professor of law at the University of San Francisco, where he serves as coordinator of the legal ethics seminar curriculum and teaches a seminar in legal ethics and the practice of law. Zitrin also teaches trial practice at USF and legal ethics at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law. He was a member of the State Bar of California's Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct from 1990 to 1996 and served as its chair in 1994-95.

Carol Langford is principal of the law office of Carol M. Langford in Walnut Creek, California, and a teacher of legal ethics at the University of San Francisco School of Law and at UC Hastings. She has also taught at UC Berkeley. She was a member of the State Bar of California's Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct from 1991 to 1997 and served as its chair in 1995-96.


From the Hardcover edition.

Bibliographic information