Policy approaches to evaluation and incentive funding in U.S. and Mexican higher education
Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 1995 - Education, Higher - 15 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
academic quality administrative Autonomous University Center Centro Chile Ciencia colleges and universities Colorado Comisión Commission for Higher comparative CONACYT context for comparison Coordinating Council countries Desarrollo developed directed funding Educación Internacional Educación Superior Education in Mexico educational policy Educativa enrollment Estados Unidos Estadounidense Evaluación evaluation and incentive Ewell and Rollin faculty FLACSO Ford Foundation funding for higher goals government policy graduate growing growth higher education institutions Higher Education Planning incentive funding increasingly institution-centered institutional level internal academic International Education Investigación Leticia Calzada Gomez Mexico Monterrey NAFTA National Commission NCHEMS occurred outcomes paper peer review performance indicators Policy Approaches policy direction policy issues policy tools political Postsecondary Review Entities private sector processes programs Public Universities Puebla research and postgraduate Rollin Kent similar Sistema Nacional social societal objectives SPRE State Postsecondary structures student Technology U.S. experience UNAM Understanding the Differences United Universidad Autónoma voluntary accreditation Western Interstate Commission