A Time to Lose: Representing Kansas in Brown Vs. Board of Education
This thoughtful and engaging memoir opens up a previously hidden side to what many consider the most important Supreme Court decision of the twentieth century. With quiet candor Paul Wilson reflects upon his role as the Kansas assistant attorney general assigned "to defend the indefensible" - the policy of "separate but equal" that was overturned on May 17, 1954 by Linda Brown's precedent-shattering suit.
The Brown decision ended legally sanctioned racial segregation in our nation's public schools, expanded the constitutional concepts of equal protection and due process of law, and in many ways launched the modern civil rights movement. Since that time, it has been cited by appellate courts in thousands of federal and state cases analyzed in hundreds of books and articles, and remains a cornerstone of law school education.
Wilson reminds us that Brown was not one case but fourincluding similar cases in South Carolina, Virginia and Delaware - and that it was only a quirk of fate that brought this young lawyer to center stage at the Supreme Court. But the Kansas case and his own role, he argues, were different from the others in significant ways. His recollections reveal why.
Recalling many events known only to Brown insiders, Wilson re-creates the world of 1950s Kansas, places the case in the context of those times and politics, provides important new information about the states ambivalent defense, and then steps back to suggest some fundamental lessons about his experience, the evolution of race relations and the lawyer's role in the judicial resolution of social conflict.
Throughout these reflections Wilson's voice shines through with sincerity, warmth, and genuine humility. Far from a self-serving apology by one of history's losers, his memoir reminds us once again that there are good people on every side of the issues that divide us and that truth and meaning are not the special preserve of history's winners.
27 pages matching legislature in this book
Results 1-3 of 27
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Brown Vs. Board of Education of Topeka: A Brief History with Documents
Waldo E. Martin
No preview available - 1998
Kansas plaintiffs in Brown v Board of Education 2223
The Historical Context
14 other sections not shown
admission appeared argued argument attend attorney black students Board of Education brief Carter chief justice Clarendon County color Congress constitutional constitutionality Copy in KSHS counsel County Davis December decision decree defend desegregation Dick Fatzer district court District of Columbia election elementary schools Elisha Scott Exodusters facilities federal filed Fourteenth Amendment governor issue Jack Greenberg Judge Huxman Judge Mellott judicial Justice Frankfurter Kansas City KSHS later law school lawyer legislative legislature ment Moore moot NAACP Negro neighborhood opinion parties permitted plaintiffs Plessy political position president Prince Edward County public education public schools question race racial segregation ratified represented responsibility Richard Kluger school districts school segregation school system Scott segregated schools segregation in public separate schools sess slavery South Carolina state's Supreme Court territorial thought Thurgood Marshall tion Topeka Board Topeka school trial unconstitutional United University of Kansas Virginia Wilson