How to evaluate unit performance
Thomas Daniel Scott, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. ARI Field Unit, Presidio of Monterey
U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1984 - History - 62 pages
9 pages matching Identify in this book
Results 1-3 of 9
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
1ST SQUAD LEADER Action Review AAR Army Research Institute assigned brief the evaluation casualties inflicted casualty exchange ratio chains of events CONDUCT AFTER ACTION controller debriefing controller/evaluator debriefing cover critical events critique dead zones detail determine discussion echelon Eisenhower Avenue elements EVALUATE UNIT PERFORMANCE evaluation form evaluator should indicate evaluator training period evaluator's Evaluators STEP example Exercise Control exercise events experienced evaluators guidance happened Identify important event inflicted or sustained locations major maneuver-arms MILES exercises mission accomplishment notes outcome information participants performance problems platoon AARs players poor casualty exchange positions Presidio of Monterey procedures questioning technique refer to actions Report or Briefing Rules of Engagement selected senior evaluator soldiers Stage Step T&EO tasks Table A-l tactical engagement simulation tactical scenario tactical training teaching points TO&E Train Evaluators training diagnosis training objectives types U.S. Army Research unit and OPFOR unit leader unit's usually VIPER GUNNER