In a recent poll of practicing art critics,†75 percent reported that rendering judgments on artworks was the least significant aspect of their job. This is a†troubling statistic for philosopher and critic Noel Carroll, who argues that that the proper task of the critic is not simply to describe, or to uncover hidden meanings or agendas, but†instead†to determine what is of value in art.
Carroll argues for a humanistic conception of criticism which focuses on what the artist has achieved by creating or performing the work. Whilst a good critic should not neglect to contextualize and offer interpretations of a work of art, he argues that too much recent criticism has ignored the fundamental role of the artist's intentions.
Including examples from visual, performance and literary arts,†and the work of contemporary critics, Carroll†provides a charming, erudite and persuasive argument that evaluation of art†is an indispensable part of the conversation of life.
What people are saying - Write a review
Review: On CriticismUser Review - Nigel Beale - Goodreads
"This book is best read by the light of another, John Carey's What Good are the Arts? (Oxford University Press, 2006), a witty, truculent, masterful polemic which argues that a ďwork of art is ... Read full review
Review: On CriticismUser Review - Goodreads
Noel Carroll is my new favorite theorist.