Reports of Civil and Criminal Cases Decided by the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1785-1951, Volume 4; Volume 61 (Google eBook)
Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, William Littell, Alexander Keith Marshall
J. Bradford, 1864 - Law reports, digests, etc
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
acres adeem ademption affidavit alleged amend amount answer appellant appellee assigned attachment authority aver Barbaroux Bardstown Bibb bill bond cause of action cause remanded chap CIRCUIT COURT cited Civil Code claim Commonwealth consideration constitution constructive notice contended contract conveyance court of equity creditors Dana debts declares deed defendant delivered the opinion demand demurrer depositors devise effect entitled equity evidence executed executor facts filed guaranty heirs held husband indorser intention interest J. J. Mar James Harlan JUDGE BULLITT judgment is reversed jury Kentucky land liable Liberia lien ment mortgage motion notice paid parties payment person petition plaintiff pleadings proceedings proved provisions purchaser question ratification real estate rendered replevin Revised Statutes rule Sechrest set-off sheriff slaves sold Stat sued sufficient suit sureties sustained term testator tion trial trustee tupra usury void wife words
Page 203 - Every action must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, except that an executor or administrator, a trustee of an express trust, or a person expressly authorized by statute, may sue, without joining with him the person for whose benefit the action is prosecuted.
Page 387 - Also to the ninth and tenth sections of an act entitled "An act to suppress insurrection, to punish treason and rebellion, to seize and confiscate the property of rebels, and for other purposes," approved July 17, 1862, and which sections are in the words and figures following: "SEC.
Page 204 - ... when the question is one of a common or general interest, of many persons, or when the parties are numerous, and it is impracticable to bring them all before the 'court, one or more may sue or defend for the benefit of all.
Page 392 - The mitigations of this rigid rule, which the humane and wise policy of modern times has introduced into practice, will more or less affect the exercise of this right, but cannot impair the right itself.
Page 385 - An Act to Suppress Insurrection, to Punish Treason and Rebellion, to Seize and Confiscate the Property of Rebels, and for other purposes...
Page 2 - State, with any deadly weapon, either in or out of the State, shall be deprived of the right to hold any office of honor or profit in this Commonwealth...
Page 345 - The court may, before, or after judgment, in furtherance of justice, and on such terms as may be proper, amend any pleading, process, or proceeding, by adding or striking out the name of any party, or by correcting a mistake in the name of a party, or a mistake in any other respect...
Page 294 - Whatever belongs merely to the remedy may be altered according to the will of the State, provided the alteration does not impair the obligation of the contract. But if that effect is produced, it is immaterial whether it is done by acting on the remedy or directly on the contract itself. In either case it is prohibited by the constitution.
Page 436 - The first arising from the rule prescribed by the law of nations; . . . when the United States declared their independence, they were bound to receive the law of nations, in its modern state of purity and refinement..