Try this search over all volumes: District Consumer Food
Results 1-0 of 0
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Benefits Achieved Many Administrative Improvements Were Experienced as
Major Manual Tasks Assumed by the Seven
11 other sections not shown
37 state agencies Achieved From Automation Achieved Its Objective adp development adp systems afdc auto AUTODEV(t automated Food Stamp Automation Has Achieved AUTOOPER(t Benefits Achieved claims and collections Comments consistent with expectations Effects of Automation eligibility workers Enhanced Funding Equipment Inventories Estimating the Effects expenditures federal funding fiscal year 1981 food stamp caseload Food Stamp Program Funding for Automation gram House Agriculture Committee increased issuance error rate issue error rate KAMES Kentucky logit transformation mated system Medicaid monthly reporting N/A N/A nonautomated North Dakota North Dakota system operation phase Operations of State/Local overissuances percent in fiscal phase of automation policy changes process food stamp program error rates program factors program measures program operations Program Results R-SQUARE Reflected in Program requirements San Antonio Service approved Service regional specific staffing Stamp Act Stamp Program automation State/Local Food Stamp systems we reviewed Table Texas timeliness tion variable Vermont