Securing the State: Reforming the National Security Decisionmaking Process at the Civil-military Nexus
Focusing on top civilian and military advisors within the national security establishment, this book looks at four case studies and concludes that when it comes to civil-military relations within the Department of Defense, balanced approaches produce more effective policies and outcomes than dominating structures.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
administration Afghanistan American armed forces best military judgment Bob Woodward campaign planning Chairman Chiefs of Staff civil-military nexus civil-military relations civil-military relationships civilian and military civilian control civilian leadership Colin Powell Combatant Commanders conﬂict Constitution Continental Congress critical decisions Defense Secretary deﬁned domination Donald Rumsfeld effective Eliot Cohen executive Feaver Federalist ﬁeld ﬁrst Franks H.R. McMaster Huntington inﬂuence Iraq Iraq Study Group Iraq war Iraqi Janowitz Joint Chiefs Joint Staff Kohnís Madisonian approach Marshall Marshallís military advice military leaders militaryís Myers national security decisionmaking national security establishment objective ofﬁce ofﬁcer corps ofﬁcials operations options Pentagon political appointees position Powell President Bush presidential professional preparation reﬂect responsibilities Richard Kohn role scholars Secretary of Defense security decisionmaking process senior Shinseki signiﬁcant Soldier speciﬁcally Stimson strategic analysis structure and norms subjective control Tommy Franks top military ofﬁcer top-level troops Vietnam Washington York