The Future of the California Bar: Final Report of the Commission on the Future of the Legal Profession and the State Bar of CaliforniaThe Commission, 1995 - Lawyers |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 59
Page 151
... Court should be transferred to the Supreme Court . The budget of the discipline function of the State Bar should be approved solely by the Supreme Court . The Chief Trial Counsel should be appointed by the Supreme Court without ...
... Court should be transferred to the Supreme Court . The budget of the discipline function of the State Bar should be approved solely by the Supreme Court . The Chief Trial Counsel should be appointed by the Supreme Court without ...
Page 153
... Supreme Court Procedures ( the Richardson Committee ) appointed by the Chief Justice found that the Supreme Court was devoting too much time to State Bar matters . that time the Supreme Court was reviewing individually each disciplinary ...
... Supreme Court Procedures ( the Richardson Committee ) appointed by the Chief Justice found that the Supreme Court was devoting too much time to State Bar matters . that time the Supreme Court was reviewing individually each disciplinary ...
Page 4
... Court.1 In addition , it is the California Supreme Court , not the State Bar , that has the ultimate authority to determine whether to suspend or disbar an attorney for professional misconduct ; the State Bar , through its State Bar Court ...
... Court.1 In addition , it is the California Supreme Court , not the State Bar , that has the ultimate authority to determine whether to suspend or disbar an attorney for professional misconduct ; the State Bar , through its State Bar Court ...
Common terms and phrases
access to justice activities administration of justice adversarial system agency alternative dispute resolution American Bar Association Angeles Association of San attorney discipline system Bar Court Bar Examiners Bar of California Bar should continue Bar Structure Bar's board of governors bono CA OPPOSES California SUPPORTS California Supreme Court clients COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION competence Conference of Delegates consensus costs counsel County Bar Association disciplinary dispute resolution elected ensure Executive Committee Executive Director fees focus groups functions funding Futures Commission increasing issues judges justice system law schools Legal Aid legal profession Legal Services Section legal system legal technicians legislative licensing mandatory bar MCLE membership OPPOSES participants practice of law practitioners president president-elect pro bono professional conduct programs regulation regulatory Report RESPONSES RECEIVED SUPPORT role Rules of Professional San Francisco SUPPORTS staff Subcommittee Supreme Court TOTAL RESPONSES RECEIVED trends unified bar voluntary bar voluntary state bars