Vandals in the Stacks?: A Response to Nicholson Baker's Assault on Libraries

Front Cover
Greenwood Press, Jan 1, 2002 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 219 pages
1 Review
A response to the book that generated wide-scale public discussion and controversy about libraries and archives. Libraries and archives have violated their public trust, argues Nicholson Baker in his controversial book Double Fold, by destroying traditional books, newspapers, and other paper-based collections. Baker's powerful and persuasive book is wrong and misleading, and Cox critiques it point by point, questioning his research, his assumptions, and his arguments about why and how newspapers, books, and other collections are selected and maintained. Double Fold, which reads like a history of libraries and archives, is not a history at all, but a journalistic account that is often based on fanciful and far-flung assertions and weak data. The present book provides an opportunity to understand how libraries and archives view their societal mandate, the nature of their preservation and documentary functions, and the complex choices and decisions that librarians and archivists face.Libraries and archives are not simple warehouses for the storage of objects to be occasionally called upon by a scholar, but they play vital roles in determining and shaping a society's knowledge and documentation.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

LibraryThing Review

User Review  - Othemts - LibraryThing

Richard Cox writes a valiant response to Nicholson Bakerís Double Fold, citing heavily from the previous work to show the flaws in Bakerís critique and attempt to set the record straight from the ... Read full review

Contents

Introduction
1
Life Imitates Art?
11
The Big Picture and Bakers World
31
Copyright

9 other sections not shown

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2002)

RICHARD J. COX is Professor, School of Information Sciences, University of Pittsburgh.

Bibliographic information